Advertisement

May 26, 2013

Patent Office Finalizes Rules on Preissuance Submissions by Third Parties

On July 17, 2012 the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced its final rule provisions on preissuance submissions by third parties, in connection with the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. The final rule provisions allow for a third party to submit patents, patent applications, and other relevant printed publications to the USPTO for consideration while examining another party’s patent application. These provisions become effective on September 16, 2012 and apply to all patent applications, regardless of filing date.

Historically, the only way for the USPTO to evaluate a third party submission is by a protest. A protest must be filed before an application publishes, unless the applicant consents. Thus, protests are rarely filed and it is extremely difficult for third parties to effectively submit prior art. With the recent changes to preissuance submissions, third parties may now submit relevant prior art to the USPTO for a patent application that has already been published. Clients should consider monitoring their competitor’s published patent applications. Additionally, clients should be cognizant of their ability to submit prior art that conflicts with the patentability of a competitor’s patent application. 

Preissuance submissions may be made on any non-provisional utility, design, or plant patent application, as well as any continuing application. They may not be made on reissue applications, reexamination proceedings, or issued patents. Submissions must be in writing and can be filed electronically with the USPTO. A submission must include (1) a document list identifying all documents submitted; (2) a concise description of the asserted relevance of each item in the document list; (3) a legible copy of each item in the document list (except U.S. patents and U.S. patent applications); (4) an English translation of any non-English language item in the document list; and (5) a statement by the submitting party that the party is not under a duty to disclose and that the submission complies with all of the above listed requirements. There are also a number of formatting requirements for the document list. 

The cost of a third party submission is $180 for every ten items. There is no fee if the submission includes three or fewer total items and is accompanied by a statement that the submission is the first and only third party submission. A third-party submission must be filed before the date of a notice of allowance. A submission must also be filed before the later of (1) six months after the publication date, or (2) the date of the first rejection of any claim.

The new preissuance submission procedure provides clients with a new and cost effective way to submit prior art to the USPTO and should be considered along with other options for challenging the validity of patents and pending applications. 

Kevin McCormick also contributed to this article.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

richard l. kaiser, partner, michael best law firm
Partner

Richard Kaiser is a partner in our Intellectual Property Practice Group, focusing on patent prosecution for the mechanical arts and having extensive experience with both utility and design patents. Mr. Kaiser works closely with clients to provide meaningful and practical guidance on both U.S. and foreign patent strategies. He is proficient with all steps of the patenting process, from initial patentability searching and analysis, to patent application drafting, and finally with the nuances of prosecuting the pending patent applications before the various patent offices. Mr. Kaiser also has...

262-956-6576

About the Author

alan c. cheslock, attorney, michael best and friedrich
Attorney

Alan Cheslock is an attorney in the Milwaukee office and a member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group.

414-225-2741

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement