May 24, 2012

With Patent Reform Going into Effect, What Should Patent Holders Do Now?

As the first major revision to the U.S. patent law in more than 50 years begins to take effect, there is a lot that companies that own patents and that create patentable inventions should keep in mind.

First, it is important to prepare for the significant changes to patent law and practice that already have gone into effect (such as the ability to accelerate the patent application review process with an additional payment to the Patent and Trademark Office) and that will soon be going into effect. Among the upcoming changes: beginning on September 16, third parties will have the right to make "prior art" submissions during a patent's prosecution; that will require extra thought and work by applicants as well as by third parties seeking to challenge the grant of a patent.

Similarly, when the patent system changes from a "first-to-invent" to "first-to-file" system on March 16, 2013, applicants will need to be ready with their provisional filings - and will need to be aware of prior art.

Patent-Defense Litigators

Changes to the patent law are generating only some of the issues that patent owners must consider. Another big factor is that the patent bar itself is changing.

The Wall Street Journal recently highlighted this development in an article pointing out that a number of patent-defense litigators have left their law firms to work for companies that some have characterized as "patent trolls." Instead of defending patents, these attorneys now represent patent-holding plaintiffs known as "nonpracticing entities" that own numbers of old patents or patents that have not been used. The lawyers, on behalf of these companies, seek out infringing - or potentially infringing - entities with which they try to negotiate licenses or against which they bring infringement actions.

The rise of patent trolls is significant, of course, for companies that own patents as well as for companies that may be cited for infringement. It also makes it all the more important, however, for patent holders to retain law firms that have their interests in mind. As the Journal pointed out, some experts believe that the practice of patent law will be "going the way of others, such as employment and securities, in which lawyers represent either defendants or plaintiffs, but not both."

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2012. All rights reserved.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.