Advertisement

July 28, 2014

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) - Growing Old Ain’t for Wimps

As the saying goes, growing old ain’t for wimps, and caring for aging Americans also ain’t for wimps these days, with the passage of health reform. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) passed earlier this year includes several nettlesome provisions for providers caring for elderly patients or residents, including:
 

  • The Elder Justice Act: From reporting of “suspected crimes” to establishing various governmental advisory boards and councils, this section of PPACA establishes multiple new legal obligations for long-term facilities, but also establishes several new programs or grants to enhance long-term care with a focus on reducing abuse, neglect, and exploitation. The programs relate to various areas in long-term care, such as staffing, adult protective services, and research. Many of these provisions are effective now with little or no guidance from the government.
     
  • New Transparency Requirements: PPACA mandates the revelation of significantly more invasive information about owners, managers, governing body members, and other “additional disclosable parties” of regulated facilities. A facility will have to certify that the information is accurate and current or face penalties. A standardized format for this information (along with some analysis of what information is needed) is due out by March 2012, but you must have this information (whatever it may be) available now if the government pays your facility a visit.
     
  • Fraud and Abuse Changes from the Escrow of Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs) and New Grounds for Exclusion: PPACA establishes various new grounds for exclusion and CMPs, as well as increased penalty thresholds for existing CMPs. The real kicker is that because of PPACA, CMS can collect a large CMP from you and keep that money in an escrow account until all appeals are exhausted. How’s that for a drain on cash flow? PPACA permits a facility to reduce a CMP by 50% in some situations, but this reduction is for specific nonserious violations and is bogged down by many, many caveats and limitations. PPACA also provides for the independent informal dispute resolution of CMPs, another change that sounds good until you read all the restrictions and pitfalls associated with this process, including its “pay to play” provisions under which providers who elect to use this “independent” process must pay for the costs of conducting it.
     
  • Mandatory Compliance Programs: If you haven’t done so already, your facility will need to have a compliance and ethics program in place by March 2013. You can (hopefully) expect some amount of additional governmental guidance in the coming months. For now, CMS has issued a call for comments and suggestions on what should be required in SNF compliance programs and has awarded a federal contract to a group of researchers and industry experts to develop recommendations for SNF compliance and ethics programs.

These are just a few of the new governmental efforts focused on long-term care providers in health reform. While PPACA does include several workforce programs and grants that may actually benefit providers over the long haul, the law also contains many provisions that are punitive and burdensome (in terms of administration, staffing, and finances). The law also contains a plan to develop incentives for individuals to purchase long term care insurance, with somewhat limited per-day payment rates to facilities. Some have noted the irony of the Obama administration providing to the long term care industry another insurance-related product in legislation touted as curing abuses in the health insurance industry.

© 2014 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Ken is a long term care attorney advising clients on a wide variety of legal planning issues arising in the skilled nursing facility setting, assisted living setting, and other spheres of long term care. He is a frequent national lecturer and author of industry manuals, national trade journal magazine articles and similar training tools. He serves Poyner Spruill clients by focusing on legal issues impacting the long term care and health services sector. Ken also serves as head of Poyner Spruill's Health Law Section.

Representative Experience

  • Served...
(919) 783-2917

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.