May 24, 2012

PBGC Publishes Preliminary Plan for Regulatory Review; Will Re-Examine Reportable Event and 4062(e) Guidance

In response to an Executive Order from the White House to identify opportunities to make government regulations less burdensome and more effective, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) recently published its Preliminary Plan for Regulatory Review.  Most notably, PBGC noted that it had begun implementing the Executive Order by reconsidering several rules it has recently proposed:

  • Reportable Events: PBGC announced it was already planning to re-propose regulations regarding reportable events under Section 4043 of the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
     
  • ERISA Section 4062(e): PBGC announced it will also reconsider its proposed rule regarding the substantial cessation of operations by employers that maintain defined benefit pension plans in light of public comments.  As previously noted by our Firm and several industry groups, the proposed rule had the potential to impose unexpected and extensive liability for employers who undertake routine corporate actions.

In addition, according to the Preliminary Plan, PBGC intends to review the following rules:

  • Voluntary Correction Programs: PBGC will consider whether to expand its current voluntary correction program for errors related to filings and other requirements.
     
  • Premiums: PBGC will review the premium payment requirements for small plans to determine whether changes could be made that would enable small plans to streamline their premium and funding valuation procedures.
     
  • ERISA Section 4010: PBGC will review ERISA Section 4010 (Annual Financial and Actuarial Information Reporting) and the filing application to determine whether the burden on employers can be reduced.

PBGC also intends to review various other sections of Title IV of ERISA to delete obsolete regulations or incorrect references, fill-in gaps where additional guidance would be helpful and simplify language.

President Obama's Executive Order called for an "open exchange" of information among government officials, experts, stakeholders and the public.  Accordingly, the PBGC is accepting public comments on its Preliminary Plan.  For more information regarding submitting comments, click here.

© 2012 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Counsel

Maureen O'Brien is counsel in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  She focuses her practice on advising clients on a broad range of employee benefits matters, including qualified plan design, welfare plan design, employee benefit plan compliance issues, fiduciary matters, multiemployer pension plan issues and nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

312-984-3242

About the Author

Partner

Joseph S. Adams is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Joe focuses his practice on employee benefits and executive compensation matters for public, private and tax-exempt organizations

312-984-7790

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.