Advertisement

April 19, 2014

Persons Deemed Managing Directors in Fact in Germany Have Fiduciary Duties Under German Law

Under German corporate law, the managing director of a GmbH (German limited liability company) has general fiduciary duties to the company.  While this concept has not been laid down in German corporate law statutes, it has been widely accepted by German courts.  The precise scope of these fiduciary duties is somewhat unclear, but there is in general a broad understanding that managing directors of a GmbH: (i) must keep sensitive company matters confidential, (ii) in the event of a direct conflict of interest between the managing director and the company, the managing director must act to protect the company and (iii) the managing director is prevented from exploiting its position in the company to enrich itself at the expense of the company, i.e. by accepting a commission fee in exchange for arranging a transaction with the company.

In a recent decision, the German Supreme Court (BGH) had to analyse the question of whether a managing director in fact (i.e. a person without a formal appointment as managing director but who directly or indirectly exercises substantial influence over the company’s business decisions) may also be subject to such fiduciary duties.  This fiduciary duty was analyzed in connection with a criminal embezzlement action, however, the fiduciary relationship of the person to the company had to be clarified.  The BGH held that while the threshold whether an individual can be deemed to be a “managing director in fact” is high, once that threshold has been passed, the person in question will have fiduciary duties to the company.  Consequently, an individual who can be viewed as managing director in fact cannot argue that the lack of a formal appointment as managing director precludes him owing fiduciary duties to a company.  It should therefore be carefully checked whether the test criteria of a managing director in fact of a GmbH may apply, as this may mean that such person has fiduciary duties to the company in question and could be liable for damages if it violates those fiduciary duties. 

© 2014 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author

Dr. Clemens Just, Corporate Attorney, McDermott Will Law Firm
Partner

Dr Clemens Just is a partner in the corporate department of McDermott Will & Emery Rechtsanwälte Steuerberater LLP based in the Frankfurt office. 

Clemens advises on all aspects of corporate law and M&A transactions. Clemens has extensive experience acting for financial and strategic investors and on private and public takeovers. His experience includes corporate restructurings and insolvency law issues. 

Clemens regularly publishes in professional journals and books and lectures on corporate law issues. He has been specifically recommended, inter...

49-69-951-145-123

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gil