Advertisement

June 17, 2013

Phase-out of Form I-94 around the corner

According to a travel update issued by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), the Agency is forging ahead with a plan to eliminate the issuance of Forms I-94 to individuals arriving at air and sea ports of entry. Forms I-94 will continue to be issued at land borders. For those arriving by air and by sea, the proposed admission procedures will consist of a passport stamp but no other documentation. 

A Form I-94 (Arrival/Departure Record) is given to foreign nationals entering the United States.   Upon entry, a CBP agent stamps the I-94 with the date of entry, annotates it with the immigration status given to the foreign national, and indicates how long the person may remain in lawful status in the United States. 

This unassuming white card stapled into a foreign national’s passport is actually a critical piece of one’s immigration status. It serves as evidence that the person is in the United States legally and is used by hundreds of state and federal agencies as proof of eligibility for certain public benefits, such as a driver’s license. In some cases, combined with a valid foreign passport, a Form I-94 is a “List A” document for  I-9 purposes. A valid I-94 also permits qualified foreign nationals to enter the United States using the  Automatic Visa Revalidation provisions of 22 C.F.R. § 41.112(d) after brief travel to Canada or Mexico.

CBP has provided two justifications for the I-94’s demise.  First, CBP has stated that the information contained on the I-94 is no longer needed. The Department of State gathers the same information during the visa application process that takes place at U.S. Embassies and Consulates abroad. Furthermore, CBP has access to the Advance Passenger Information System (APIS), a database used by commercial carriers to record all incoming passenger information. Thus CBP already has the I-94 information by the time a person boards a plane headed to the United States. Second, CBP consumes approximately $19 million in staffing resources to issue and administer Form I-94s. Another $17 million is spent paying an airline contractor just to enter I-94 data into a database. This creates a huge financial incentive to slim down admission procedures. 

At first blush, the justifications offered for the elimination of the I-94 seem perfectly reasonable. However, CBP has provided little practical guidance about the aftermath of their unilateral initiative. There has been no indication how this will impact an employer’s ability to complete a Form I-9 or a foreign national’s ability to obtain a driver’s license. Before CBP launches significant changes, the Agency should engage with state and federal stakeholders to study the full impact of this decision.

 

 

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Michele is an Associate in the Boston office where she works with both large and small clients on employment-based immigration matters. Her practice includes the processing of B, E, H, J, L, and TN non-immigrant visa petitions, outstanding researcher and extraordinary ability petitions, adjustment of status applications and labor certification applications.

Prior to joining Mintz Levin, she served as an Attorney Advisor with the US Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review. 

Michele received her JD from St. John’s University School of Law...

617-348-1771

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.