Advertisement

April 16, 2014

The Political Risks of Doing Business Overseas

Early in his presidency, Barack Obama said he would like to see the United Sates double its exports by the end of 2014. By 2011, this goal looked to be on track when exports exceeded $2 trillion, a 15% increase from the year before, according to Department of Commerce figures. Meanwhile, direct foreign investment by U.S. companies in 2010 increased by $361 billion, up 10% from the previous year.

However, despite this opportunity, doing business overseas is not without its risks. At its most basic, American companies need to protect two types of assets: property and revenue streams. Fortunately, there are insurance products for both. For property, including equity in foreign companies and other investments, there is political risk insurance.

When it comes to growth, the developing world is where the action is. According to the International Monetary Fund, Asia and Latin America are growing at a rate of 8% and 7%, respectively. Developing countries are now attracting two-fifths of the world's foreign direct investment. In short, business is booming -- over there.

Economic volatility often goes hand-in-hand with political instability, however. Governments in high-growth regions tend to be unstable. American companies that acquire overseas businesses, create subsidiaries or buy or build infrastructure are at risk from a variety of perils including war, nationalization of assets, government breach of contract, civil disturbances, currency convertibility restrictions, adverse regulatory changes and more.

According to a recent World Bank survey of companies making foreign investments, political risk ranked as their primary concern. Companies that rely on interconnected production networks and supply chains are particularly susceptible to political disruption. Fortunately, insurers are willing to write political risk insurance against many of these perils.

Most political risk insurance is written by members of the Berne Union, an international organization of export credit agencies, multilateral trade groups and private insurers. The government-run export credit agencies and multilaterals account for about 80% of all premium written. Private political risk insurers account for the remaining 20% by writing policies that are easier to place and more specialized. All told, the Berne Union wrote nearly $1.2 billion in premium in 2010, up 15% from 2009.

Each policy is highly customized. Underwriters typically start by inventorying assets, assigning value to property and income streams and then calculating the probability of political risk events. In recent years, globalization, electronic money flows, access to mass communication, the internet and social media have made gauging political risk events far more difficult. Last year's Arab Spring is a good example of a completely unanticipated upheaval that cost political risk insurers some $100
million in claims.

The nature of political risk is also changing. The classic "banana republic" scenario of revolutionaries, violent government overthrows and expropriation of foreign-owned assets has given way to less overt government subterfuges like changes in local banking or business regulations, manipulation of exchange rates, changes in foreign ownership rules or legal technicalities.
Of the ways political risk can manifest itself, more than 50% of the World Bank survey respondents said adverse regulatory changes top their list of concerns. A host country's breach of contract ranked second with about 45%, and currency convertibility restrictions ranked third with about 35%. The classic political risks (expropriation and war) were of primary concern to only 22% and 9%, respectively. 

For the time being, the focus of political risk insurance remains on the developing world. But as economies become more global, there is a potential for increased political risk in the industrialized world, especially within the remnants of the former Soviet Union, where Russia still has great influence and potential for political and economic mischief. In the meantime, political risk insurance remains an excellent indicator of economic growth. Premiums, according to the World Bank, are on an upward trend.

----------

Kerstin Braun, PhD, is executive vice president of Coface North America.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2014 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.