May 24, 2012

Potential North Carolina Utilities Commission "NCUC" Regulation for Sanitary Districts in North Carolina?

The North Carolina Utilities Commission (“NCUC”) could find itself regulating a host of new water and sewer providers if recently filed House Bill 464 is enacted into law. Filed on March 24, 2011, HB464 is sponsored by Representative Dockham and is entitled: An Act Providing That A Sanitary District Is A Public Utility Subject To Regulation By The North Carolina Utilities Commission.

HB464 applies only to sanitary districts that are created pursuant to North Carolina General Statute Chapter 130A, Article 2, Part 2. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. Chapter 130A, the Commission for Public Health may create sanitary districts for the purpose of providing water and sewer service within the district. Sanitary districts are governed by a board that is elected by the board or boards of county commissioners of the counties where the district is located. Sanitary districts have the authority to, among other things, levy taxes within the district, compel connection to the water and sewer system, establish fire departments, establish zoning units, make special assessments against benefited property, and condemn private property. Sanitary boards are responsible for setting service charges and rates pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 130A 64.

In the event HB464 becomes law, sanitary districts would become subject to NCUC regulation. The biggest impact arising from NCUC regulation would be that sanitary boards would no longer be able to independently establish rates for water and sewer service. Instead, sanitary districts would be required to seek authority from the NCUC to increase utility rates, which would be based on a calculation derived from the district’s net investment in the facilities, operating expenses and a reasonable rate of return. The NCUC generally requires customer hearings prior to adjusting a utility’s rates in order to identify (and compel correction of) service issues or deficiencies. NCUC regulation also would include standards with respect to billing, service disconnection, record keeping, disposal of utility assets and expansion of the district’s service area. Currently, sanitary districts exercise control over these aspects of their operation.

The potential for extending NCUC jurisdiction to include sanitary districts presents a number of issues. Sanitary districts will experience increased administrative and regulatory burdens. While the customer will receive the benefit of NCUC supervision over sanitary district water and sewer rates, the customer will be saddled with the costs incurred to comply with Chapter 62 and NCUC rules. Sanitary districts will also have to face the challenge of converting their current operations to a regulated framework and may be subject to the public utility regulatory fee established in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 62-302(b).

The NCUC also will face challenges as it seeks the most efficient way to regulate a quasi-public body. Historically, the utility rates and service of public bodies have been unregulated under the theory that a customer’s recourse was through elected officials and the ballot box. If HB464 becomes law, the NCUC will have to determine the most effective way to regulate a quasi-public body that has taxing authority and other privileges afforded to public entities—not to mention a history of establishing its own rates and service protocols. It is likely that substantial changes to Chapter 62 will be required to address these issues and reconcile the inherent differences between privately-owned and publically-owned utilities.

It is important to note that HB464 only serves to bring Chapter 130A sanitary districts under NCUC jurisdiction. The bill does not seek to extend NCUC jurisdiction to water and sewer authorities established pursuant to Chapter 162A, such as Orange Water and Sewer Authority, Cape Fear Utility Authority and Yadkin Valley Sewer Authority. It also does not seek to extend NCUC regulation to county and city utility systems. Those entities can breathe easy for now.

HB464 passed its first reading on March 28, 2011 and was referred to the Public Utilities Committee. The bill must be passed by both the North Carolina House and Senate and signed by the governor prior to becoming law. This same bill was filed in the House during the 2009-2010 Session, but was never passed by the House.

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Chris’ practice focuses on the representation of electric, telecommunications, gas, water, and wastewater public utilities. He also practices in the areas of environmental, land use, renewable energy, and appellate law.

Representative Experience

  • Represent electric, telecommunication, gas, water and sewer utilities in regulatory and complaint proceedings before North Carolina Utilities Commission (NCUC).
  • Represent water, wastewater and electric utilities in general rate case applications.
  • Represent and advise...
919-783-1152

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.