May 24, 2012

Potential Tax Trap: Real Estate Transfer Taxes and Entity Acquisitions

State and local real estate transfer taxes can be a significant and sometimes overlooked cost in certain acquisition transactions. In many states, including Illinois, the transfer of a controlling interest in an entity that owns real estate can trigger a real estate transfer tax, even though the real estate itself is not transferred. Currently, 16 states impose some sort of a real estate transfer tax upon the transfer of a controlling interest in an entity that owns real estate located in that state.

The transfer of a controlling interest for real estate transfer tax purposes typically means a transfer of “control,” which can be as little as 50 percent and as high as 90 percent, depending on the real estate transfer tax laws of the relevant state. Many states aggregate certain transfers of interests occurring within a particular time frame in determining whether there is a transfer of “control.” Illinois, for example, aggregates certain transfers that occur over a two-year period. Additionally, many states require that the entity be a “real estate entity” in order to impose a real estate transfer tax upon a transfer of control. A “real estate entity” generally means an entity engaged in a real estate business where a certain minimum percentage of its income and assets are derived from or consist of real estate.

Certain real estate transfers (including certain transfers of a controlling interest in a real estate owning entity) are exempt from real estate transfer taxes. Although the laws vary from state to state, exempt transfers typically include: (i) an exchange of interests in an entity in order to effectuate a mere change of identity or form of ownership or organization where there is no actual change in beneficial ownership, (ii) transfers involving a parent and subsidiary, (iii) mergers between corporations and (iv) transfers of interests in publicly traded companies. The types of exemptions and the legal conditions for claiming exemptions differ greatly from state to state and require an analysis of the relevant state’s real estate transfer tax laws in order to properly ascertain whether a real estate transfer tax may be due.

As more and more states look to increase revenues, the trend will be for more states to expand the application of real estate transfer taxes to transfers of controlling interests in real estate owning entities. Accordingly, more and more acquisition transactions involving the transfer of a controlling interest in an entity are likely to trigger real estate transfer taxes. Clients engaged in an acquisition transaction should be made aware of the potential costs resulting from an imposition of real estate transfer taxes and should take these costs into consideration when evaluating the overall cost of the acquisition and in allocating these costs  among the parties to the acquisition.

FEDERAL TAX NOTICE: Treasury Regulations require us to inform you that any federal tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Associate

Prior to joining Vedder Price, Mr. Dorner served as Deputy General Counsel for the Illinois Department of Revenue.  As Deputy General Counsel, he was responsible for managing the Department of Revenue’s Income Tax Litigation Office, where he developed and effectuated tax policy for the state and advised the Director of Revenue, the General Counsel and the Governor’s Office regarding the state’s tax laws and policies.  Mr. Dorner was also responsible for supervising and training the Department’s Special Assistant Attorneys General assigned to income tax...

312-609-7764

About the Author

Shareholder

Timothy W. O’Donnell is a Shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Tax & Estate Planning practice group and Global Transportation Finance team. 

312-609-7683

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.