May 24, 2012

President Obama Appoints Three to NLRB During Purported Congressional "Recess"

On January 4, 2012, President Obama used his recess powers to appoint three members to the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”). These appointments were made one day after the NLRB lost a quorum on its five-seat board following the expiration of the 2010 recess appointment of NLRB Member (and former top lawyer with the SEIU and AFL-CIO) Craig Becker. Under the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, the Board must have a quorum of three members to decide cases and issue enforceable decisions. These new recess appointments restored the Board’s quorum, thereby avoiding a shutdown of the Board’s operations.

Specifically, the three new appointees include: 

(1) Sharon Block (Democrat) – Deputy Assistant Secretary for Congressional Affairs at the U.S. Department of Labor, and a former NLRB and Senate committee attorney; 

(2) Terence F. Flynn (Republican) – Chief Counsel to NLRB Member Brian Hayes and who previously was Chief Counsel to former NLRB Member Peter Schaumber; and 

(3) Richard Griffin (Democrat) – General Counsel for International Union of Operating Engineers and who also serves on the board of directors for the AFL-CIO Lawyers Coordinating Committee, a position he has held since 1994. 

Nevertheless, the recess appointments have come under fire and likely will be challenged in court as illegitimate on constitutional grounds. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the President’s move “is highly irregular and virtually unprecedented. While the Constitution vests the president with the authority to make recess appointments, the conventional wisdom has been that it requires a recess of more than 3 days in order for the president to exercise this authority.” 

In the past 30 years, no President has used the recess appointment power in a recess of less than nine days. President Obama’s recess appointments were made while the Senate, arguably, was not technically in recess. The Senate has been holding pro forma sessions in which it has been meeting briefly every few days. President Obama contends that he has the authority to make appointments when the Senate is “effectively” in recess. As a result, future Board decisions potentially could be subject to challenge on grounds that the Board’s quorum is illegitimate and that it does not have the lawful authority to issue enforceable decisions. 

In the meantime, President Obama’s recess appointments give the Board a 3-2 Democratic majority. Therefore, employers can continue to expect NLRB decisions that are labor friendly and intended to bolster union organizing efforts.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Mr. Fisch is a partner in the Labor & Employment Practice Group in the firm's Century City office

310-228-3721

About the Author

Associate

Ms. Chang is an associate in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm's Orange County office.

714.424.2875

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.