Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Press Coverage Triggers HIPAA-Related Inquiry

Most state and federal health care investigations are prompted by audits or claims brought by whistleblowers.   But a recent newspaper article about a debt collection company’s tactics has prompted Congressional ire and potentially a federal investigation. 

On April 24th, a New York Times article highlighted Accretive Health’s alleged debt collection practices after Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson released company documents detailing the company’s activities.  Accretive Health purportedly placed debt collectors, who were indistinguishible from hospital employees, in emergency rooms to require patients to make overdue payments before they could receive treatment.  Attorney General Swanson claimed that such tactics violated the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) by conditioning care upon payment; the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) by giving the company’s debt collectors access to health records; and state collections laws by failing to properly identify the debt collectors.

Just two days after the New York Times article was published, Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) sent identical letters to the Acting Adminstrator of the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services Acting Administrator Marilyn Tavenner and the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services  Daniel Levinson, urging the agencies to launch an investigation of the company’s potential violation of federal laws.  Rep. Stark also requested a report on federal enforcement measures and a warning to all hospitals that participate in Medicare, if Accretive Health’s activities are found to violate federal law.

In a press release, Rep. Stark commented: “The debt collection tactics apparently being used by Accretive Health to get money from patients waiting to be seen by an ER doctor or recuperating in a hospital bed are abominable.  This is corporate greed at its worst, abuse of patients’ rights to dignity and privacy, and, I believe, a possible violation of several laws.  Such disgusting practices must be stopped and I’ll do everything in my power to ensure that happens.”

As if the traditional modes of enforcement were not reason enough, these events should provide even more motivation for health care providers and their business associates to diligently ensure full compliance with state and federal health care laws.  And to stay out of the newspaper!

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Prior to joining Mintz Levin, Kimberly was an associate at Arent Fox LLP. Her practice focused on health care and corporate matters such as mergers and acquisitions, financings, regulatory compliance, licensing, reimbursement, and privacy.

Kimberly's experience includes negotiating, reviewing, and drafting agreements, including stock and asset purchase agreements, operations transfer agreements, and loan agreements. She has also advised health care clients with respect to HIPAA, HITECH, fraud and abuse issues, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, food and drug laws, and state...

(212) 692-6706

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.