May 24, 2012

Project Labor Agreement Regulations are Published

While Congress and President Obama have been unable to deliver the long-promised Employee Free Choice Act to labor unions, the President has attempted to deliver on other campaign promises to labor.  Within a month of his election, he signed an executive order setting aside his predecessor’s proscription on project labor agreements and, instead, encouraging the use of such agreements on large-scale construction projects.  The rules to flesh out this executive order were recently promulgated by the Defense Department and other agencies, provide some guidance regarding factors that agencies may consider to determine whether a project labor agreement is appropriate, although, the use of a PLA is strongly encouraged.  The regulations also allow an awarding agency to specify in the bid solicitation, the terms and conditions of the PLA and require the successful bidder to become party to the PLA.  The regulations can be found at edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/2010-8117. 

The use of PLAs has long been opposed by non-union industry groups since they typically require non-union contractors to hire employees out of union hiring halls and pay trust fund contributions on behalf of their non-union employees, even though they will not reap the benefits of those contributions.  The end result is an increase in the cost of these projects subject to PLAs.  The administration’s action in conjunction with Congressional requirements that projects receiving American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds be subject to the federal Davis-Bacon Act, will drive up the cost of public construction just at a time when federal and state coffers are in the red.

For construction contractors, the new regulations as well the ARRA strings on construction projects will require a level of knowledge and sophistication to steer through the  complexities of PLAs as well as federal and state public works statutes.  Absent such knowledge, contractors are sure to run afoul of contract specifications or, worse, the law.  

© 2002-2012 by Williams Kastner ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

About the Author

Member

Judd Lees has been practicing labor and employment law since 1979 and is a Member in the Seattle office. He is the chair of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Practice Group. Mr. Lees represents both unionized and nonunionized employers in the private and public sector, including clients in the construction, manufacturing and the transportation industries before federal and state agencies, including the Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board and the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries.

206-233-2893

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.