May 24, 2012

Proposed Federal Laws Would Mandate Paid Sick Leave For Employees with H1N1

Proposed federal laws would require employers to provide paid sick leave to employees infected with flu-like or contagious illnesses, such as the H1N1 virus. Both of the laws, if passed, would take effect 15 days after enactment and would end after two years. There is also pending legislation to require paid vacation.

Senator Christopher Dodd and Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut introduced legislation that would allow employees to earn up to seven paid sick days each year to use for leave due to their own flu-like symptoms, medical diagnosis or preventive care, to care for a sick child, or to care for a child whose school or child care facility has been closed due to the spread of flu. Employers would be allowed to require medical certification from employees requesting this leave.

Representatives George Miller and Lynn Woolsey of California introduced similar legislation, the Emergency Influenza Containment Act (H.R. 3991). That law would require that employees be given up to five paid sick days if they are sent home or directed to stay home by an employer because of a contagious illness, such as H1N1. The law would apply to employers with 15 or more employees, and both full-time and part-time employees would be entitled to leave. Employees who follow their employer’s direction to stay home because of contagious illness could not be discharged, disciplined, or discriminated against based on their absences. Employers who already provide at least five paid sick days to employees would not have to provide additional leave. This bill was referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor on November 3, 2009.

Another proposed federal law would require employers to provide paid vacation to employees. H.R. 2564 was introduced in the House of Representatives by Representative Alan Grayson of Florida on May 21, 2009. This proposed law would amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to require employers with at least 100 employees to provide at least one week of paid vacation each year to each employee. This week of paid vacation would be required in addition to any sick leave or other leave required by law.

Employees would be eligible for paid vacation after they worked for their employer for one year and for at least 1,250 hours during the year. Beginning three years after the new law is enacted, the requirements would expand to cover employers with at least 50 employees and to require companies with 100 or more employees to provide two weeks of paid vacation to each eligible employee. This bill was referred to the House Subcommittee on Workforce Protections on October 22, 2009.

Employers should be diligent in addressing H1N1 issues, should follow guidance available from the Centers for Disease Control website, and should be aware of efforts to require mandatory paid sick or vacation leave. We will keep you updated on the status of proposed legislation mandating paid vacation or sick leave for employees.

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Kevin represents employers in many areas of labor and employment law, including race, age, gender, religion, national original, and disability employment discrimination claims, wrongful discharge claims, and wage and hour claims. He defends clients before administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, and the North Carolina Employment Security Commission, in state and federal courts, and in arbitrations. Kevin also provides guidance to management to ensure employment practices are in full compliance with all applicable statutes and...

919-783-2853
Of Counsel

Mike is a health care attorney advising clients on a variety of regulatory, contractual and operational issues in hospice, home care, and long-term care settings. In addition, Mike is an experienced health care consultant in regulatory, reimbursement, development and operational matters.

Prior Legal Experience

Mike's career began as a staff nurse at North Carolina Memorial Hospital in Chapel Hill.  He then went on to be the Hospital Supervisor of Raleigh Community Hospital.  After receiving his JD, Mike held consulting positions, had his own private practice...

919-783-2968

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.