May 24, 2012

Proposed Tort Reform Bill Contains Numerous Health Care Provisions (WI)

The Wisconsin Legislature is currently meeting in a Special Session called by Governor Walker to consider legislative proposals put forth by the Governor. One of the proposed bills (SS-AB 1) has been dubbed the “Tort Reform Bill,” for which most of the focus has been on its liability protections for manufacturers. However, the Tort Reform Bill also contains several provisions relevant to health care providers, as summarized below. The bill was introduced in the State Assembly on January 6, 2011.

 Increased Protections for Provider Reviews

Currently, the Wisconsin Statutes grant certain protections to the process of reviewing health care providers. For example, Section 146.37 protects anyone who participates in the good faith review of a health care provider from civil liability, and Section 146.38 generally prohibits the disclosure of records created in such a review. Both sections are subject to certain exceptions.

The Tort Reform Bill would overhaul Section 146.38 to better define its scope and expand its protections. The revised section would specify the definition of “health care provider” to include individual providers; facilities, organizations and business entities that are providers; persons working under the supervision of or in collaboration with an individual provider; and parents, subsidiaries or affiliates of entity providers. Further, the new section would clarify that a protected review could include multiple organizations and must be conducted for one of the following purposes: to help improve the quality of health care, to avoid improper utilization of the services of health care providers or to determine reasonable charges for such services.

Perhaps most significantly, revised Section 146.38 would extend the prohibition against disclosure of review records to criminal proceedings against a health care provider, rather than maintaining the current limited reach of only civil proceedings.

In a similar effort, the Tort Reform Bill would amend another section of the statutes to restrict the use of certain types of records in the possession of the Department of Regulation and Licensing and the division within the Department of Health Services in charge of health care provider quality assurance. Records required by such regulatory agencies to be disclosed by a health care provider, as well as statements and records of interviews of employees of a provider obtained by such agencies would not be available for use as evidence in a civil or criminal proceeding brought against a health care provider.

Limits on Actions Against Long-Term Care Providers

Medical malpractice awards against health care providers are currently limited by the State of Wisconsin. Specifically, non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, are limited to $750,000 and certain categories of damages available for relatives bringing a wrongful death lawsuit against a health care provider are also capped. In addition, a specific statute of limitations applies for medical malpractice claims equal to the later of three years from the date of the injury or one year from the date of discovery of the injury.

The Tort Reform Bill extends these same limitations to lawsuits brought against long-term care providers, which is defined to include: an adult family home, a residential care apartment complex, a community-based residential facility, a home health agency, a nursing home, or a hospice.

 Limits on Criminal Liability for Health Care Providers

It is a crime in Wisconsin to cause the death of or bodily harm to another person by the negligent operation or handling of a dangerous weapon, explosives or fire. A dangerous weapon is defined to include any device or instrumentality, which in the manner it is used or intended to be used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm. The statute could conceivably be used to prosecute a health care provider who is found to have acted negligently while performing a medical procedure. The Tort Reform Bill would specifically exclude health care providers acting within the scope of their practice or employment from the scope of these criminal statutes.

It is also a crime under Wisconsin law for a person who is in charge of or employed by a residential care facility, an inpatient health care facility, a treatment facility, or a home health agency to intentionally, recklessly or negligently abuse or neglect a patient or resident of such a facility or agency. The Tort Reform Bill would not impose liability for negligent abuse or neglect by a health care provider acting in the scope of his or her practice or employment when he or she commits an act or omission of mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct or failure in good performance as the result of inability, incapacity, inadvertency, ordinary negligence or good faith error in judgment or discretion.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Dave Hanson is a partner, Chair of the firm’s Health Care Practice Group and a member of the firm’s Business Practice Group. Since joining Michael Best & Friedrich LLP in 1981, Mr. Hanson has been actively engaged in a practice that emphasizes regulated industries, including health care, insurance and public utilities. He has extensive regulatory experience with state and federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Health and Human Services, the Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance and the Wisconsin Public...

608-283-2241

About the Author

Kate Bechen is a member of the Business and Health Care Practice Groups. Kate’s corporate practice focuses primarily on securities, corporate finance and general business matters. She regularly assists companies with ongoing reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as drafting and filing registration statements. Her health law practice includes transactional work, regulatory compliance (including Stark and Anti-Kickback), medical staff issues and confidentiality (including HIPAA). She is also an active member of the firm’s Renewable...

414-225-4956

Contributors

Craig Johnson is a member of the Business and Health Care Practice Groups in the Madison office. Mr. Johnson worked as a patient advocate for the UW clinical program Center for Patient Partnerships for a year and a half while attending law school. During the fall of 2007, he worked as a Judicial Intern for Hon. William C. Griesbach for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

608-257-3064

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.