September 21, 2014
September 20, 2014
September 19, 2014
Proxy Advisory Firms And Investment Adviser Registration
Recently, I wrote about a shareholder proposal seeking to hold a proxy advisor popularity contest. I commented that this could raise some interesting compliance challenges for proxy advisory firms that are registered as investment advisers. I waited, it turns out in vain, for someone to point out that not all proxy advisors are registered as investment advisers.
Are proxy advisors subject to registration as investment advisers under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940? Here’s the Securities and Exchange Commission’s answer:
Second, when proxy advisory firms provide certain services, they meet the definition of investment adviser under the Advisers Act and thus are subject to regulation under that Act. A person is an “investment adviser” if the person, for compensation, engages in the business of providing advice to others as to the value of securities, whether to invest in, purchase, or sell securities, or issues reports or analyses concerning securities. As described above, proxy advisory firms receive compensation for providing voting recommendations and analysis on matters submitted for a vote at shareholder meetings. These matters may include shareholder proposals, elections for boards of directors, or corporate actions such as mergers. We understand that typically proxy advisory firms represent that they provide their clients with advice designed to enable institutional clients to maximize the value of their investments. In other words, proxy advisory firms provide analyses of shareholder proposals, director candidacies or corporate actions and provide advice concerning particular votes in a manner that is intended to assist their institutional clients in achieving their investment goals with respect to the voting securities they hold. In that way, proxy advisory firms meet the definition of investment adviser because they, for compensation, engage in the business of issuing reports or analyses concerning securities and providing advice to others as to the value of securities.
Concept Release on the U.S. Proxy System, pages 109-110 (July 14, 2010) (fo0tnote omitted). Thus, it should be no surprise that some proxy adivsors have registered. These include Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. (ISS) and Marco Consulting Group, Inc. Other well-known proxy advisory firms, including Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC are not (itterminated its registration with the SEC on April 1, 2005). Tomorrow, I’ll discuss why some some firms are not registered with the SEC and a potential state law concern.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Revises Proposal to Adopt Consolidated FINRA Rule 2231
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Proposes Margin Rules for Uncleared Swaps
- D.C. Judge Rules in Favor of CFTC on Cross-Border Application of Dodd-Frank Rules
- Council of Institutional Investors Issues Report on Board Evaluation Disclosure
- Delaware Court Denies Dismissal for Disinterested Directors When Entire Fairness Applies
- SEC Targets Corporate Insiders for Failing to Promptly Disclose Stock Transactions