Advertisement

June 20, 2013

Qualifying Barriers Lower for "Green Technology" Patent Applications

Barriers have been lowered significantly for what now qualifies as "Green Technology" subject matter for patent applications pending before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("Patent Office"). In order to allow accelerated examination of even more pending patent applications, the Patent Office recently expanded its definition of "Green Technology" under the Green Technology Pilot Program ("Program").1 To qualify for accelerated examination, and in an attempt to balance workload and gauge available resources, the Patent Office originally required that a pending patent application be classified under one of a select list of "Green Technology" classifications, namely Alternative Energy Production, Energy Conservation, Environmentally Friendly Farming, Environmental Purification, Protection, or Remediation. The Patent Office, however, has dropped the classification requirement and is now allowing accelerated examination for any applications that are drawn toward its definition of "Green Technologies" (i.e., having claims that materially enhance the quality of the environment or that materially contribute to the discovery or development of renewable energy resources, the more efficient utilization and conservation of energy resources, or greenhouse gas emission reduction). Notwithstanding the above, the Program is still only available to the first 3,000 applicants and ends on December 8, 2010.2

Under normal Patent Office procedures, new patent applications are taken up for examination in the order in which they are filed, with the average pendency for applications in these fields being approximately two and a half years until the first Office Action.3 Applications that qualify for acceleration under the Program, however, will be placed on a special fast track, which will likely result in applications seeing their first Office Action in approximately 16 months.

In order to participate under the new rules of the Program, the application must be:

  • a non-reissue, non-provisional utility application filed prior to December 8, 2009;
  • in compliance with claim requirements;4
  • directed to a single invention5 and have claims that materially enhance the quality of the environment, or that materially contribute to:  (a) the discovery or development of renewable energy resources, (b) the more efficient utilization and conservation of energy resources, or (c) greenhouse gas emission reduction;
  • filed electronically;
  • filed prior to issuance of a first Office Action; and
  • accompanied by a request for early publication.6

The Patent Office estimates that approximately 25,000 of the currently pending patent applications meet the requirements listed above. As the Program is limited to the first 3,000 that apply, it is imperative for applicants to act quickly. Applicants should carefully weigh the Program's benefits against the requirements noted above--most notably, claim limitations, abbreviated restriction practice, and early publication. Additionally, if a previously filed petition to make special was denied solely on the basis that the application did not meet the classification requirement, a subsequent petition will be given priority as of the date of the original petition as long as the renewed petition is filed by June 21, 2010.

______________________

1 See Elimination of Classification Requirement in the Green Technology Pilot Program, 75 Fed. Reg. 28554-55 (May 21, 2010).

2 To date, more than 950 requests have been filed by applicants, with approximately 350 having been allowed. The Patent Office notes that a majority of the applications denied thus far would now be eligible with the elimination of the classification rule.

See Press Release from the Patent Office, located here ("Patent applications are normally taken up for examination in the order that they are filed. The average pendency time for applications in green technology areas is approximately 30 months to a first office action and 40 months to a final decision.").

The application must have three or fewer independent claims and 20 or fewer total claims. A preliminary amendment can be made to bring an application into compliance with this requirement. 

Applicant also must agree to make an election without traverse over the telephone if the Patent Office asserts there is more than one invention.

6 See Pilot Program for Green Technologies Including Greenhouse Gas Reduction, 74 Fed. Reg. at 64667-68 (Dec. 7, 2009). 

© 2013 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Jeffrey Whittle has experience representing clients in various technology-based transactions, including licenses, agreements for technology development, transfer, acquisition, joint development, collaboration, product development, strategic alliance, collaboration, and product distribution, as well as various other intellectual property agreements in the software, telecommunications, mechanical/electrical, e-commerce, financial, energy and medical industries.

Mr. Whittle also has experience representing clients in various patent, trademark, copyright...

713-221-1185

Contributors

Senior Counsel

Ron Derrington has drafted, filed, and prosecuted numerous patent applications directed to oilfield exploration and production hardware (including sub-sea applications), refining processes, chemical processes, rotating equipment, electrical and electro-mechanical devices, automotive improvements, fluids handling equipment, software applications, and petrochemical plant hardware. His experience includes counseling clients with regard to the development, feasibility, and protection of their intellectual property matters. Mr. Derrington is experienced in preparing and...

713-221-1515

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or o