September 22, 2014
September 21, 2014
September 20, 2014
Recall! Car Dealer’s Arbitration Policy Struck down by Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
Under the Board’s 2012 decision in D.R. Horton, an ALJ struck down a California car dealer’s arbitration policy. The ALJ held that although the car dealer’s mandatory arbitration policy did not contain an explicit class waiver, it uses language that could be construed by employees as only permitting individual arbitration actions. The ALJ’s decision seems to be another in a line of decisions where the Board (and its ALJs) look past the language of the policy to the purported effect of the policy and/or how the policy could be potentially construed. Other examples include Board decisions on confidentiality policies and social media policies.
The NLRB continues to apply its D.R. Horton decision even though three circuit courts of appeal have rejected the Board's view of class action waivers -- Owen v. Bristol Care, Inc., 702 F.3d 1050 (8th Cir); Richards v. Ernst & Young, LLP, Case No. 11-17530 (9th Cir.), and Sutherland v. Ernst & Young LLP, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16513 (2d Cir.). A majority of federal district courts have also rejected the Board's view on this with decisions from district courts in Arkansas, California, Florida, Kansas, Pennsylvania, and New York, though district courts in Missouri and Wisconsin have agreed with D.R. Horton. All eyes continue to focus on the 5th Circuit where the appeal of the Board's decision in D.R. Horton currently is pending.
A copy of the decision invalidating the arbitration policy can be found here.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Second Circuit Rules that Class Action Waivers are Allowed Under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
- Most Convenient Forum is State of Company Headquarter, Tennessee Federal Judge Finds in Collective Action
- Nevada Arbitration Clauses May Need Affirmative Agreement
- Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Untimely Filed State Law Claims from Title VII Harassment Suit
- Can You Keep a Secret? Confidentiality Clauses in Settlement Agreements Are For Real
- Play It Safe II: Employers At Risk If They Don’t Methodically Process Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Issues