May 24, 2012

Recent U.S. Government Initiatives Relating to E-Verify and Immigration and Customs Enforcement Audits

To encourage employers to use E-Verify, the Department of Homeland Security announced on November 19, 2009 that it is launching I-E-Verify. An employer is permitted to carry this designation based upon its submission to a voluntary I-9 audit by the Department of Homeland Security and a commitment to follow the best practices under IMAGE, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Mutual Agreement Between Government and Employers. Employers seeking to participate in I-E-Verify must agree to: 

  • Complete a self-assessment questionnaire;
  • Enroll in E-Verify;
  • Enroll in the Social Security Number Verification Service;
  • Adhere to IMAGE Best Employment Practices; and
  • Review and sign an official IMAGE partnership agreement with ICE.

Enrolling in I-E-Verify requires a thoughtful analysis of hiring practices before committing. As a result, we would advise clients to contact us before enrollment.

By way of background on E-Verify generally, this internet-based application operated jointly by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and the Social Security Administration (SSA) became operational on January 1, 2008. E-Verify was intended to provide employers with an easy way to verify both employment eligibility of newly hired employees and the legality of each employee's social security number. In September, 2009, E-Verify became mandatory for all federal contractors with contracts over $3,000 and has become mandatory in certain states as well: to date, Arizona, Mississippi and South Carolina.

On a more sober note, ICE, the enforcement arm of the Department of Homeland Security, announced on November 19, 2009 that it will be contacting 1,000 employers nationwide involved in “critical infrastructure” to notify them that they are to be audited. These companies have been selected either because ICE has reason to believe there may be violations or the companies’ industry sector involves public safety, key resources or national security. An audit will involve a comprehensive review of Form I-9s. The Form I-9 requires employers to review identification and work eligibility documents of each new hire and determine whether the documents reasonably appear to be genuine and relate to the individual proffering them - no small task. Since implementation last April of ICE’s worksite enforcement strategy targeting I-9 audits, notices of intent to fine have been sent totaling almost $16 million.

© 2009 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully...

919-783-2854
Of Counsel

Jennifer’s practice includes a broad range of immigration and labor and employment matters. She is a multi-lingual attorney able to handle all immigration matters, including H-1B visas, L-1A, L-1B, and H visas, J-1 visas, E-1, E-2, and Australian E-3 visas, F visas and the OPT period option, O visas, TN visas, pre-PERM and PERM labor certifications, permanent resident, investor-, employment-, and family-based visa petitions, deportation and political asylum cases, and naturalization matters.

After completing law school, Jennifer received a number of Immigration Law...

919-783-2955

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.