Advertisement

June 17, 2013

The Red Flags Rule: What You Need to Know

Risk Management Monitor

With data security and identity theft becoming a vital concern for businesses and individuals alike, a new regulation mandating how businesses protect data will come into effect next month. Because the scope of the rule is so sweeping, corporate risk managers need to know whether their organizations are subject to it and, if so, what they must do in order to comply.

Beginning December 31, the Red Flags Rule, which will be enforced by the FTC, the National Credit Union Administration and a host of other federal bank regulators, will require all organizations subject to the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 to implement a formal identity theft prevention program. The mandate is directed primarily at banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and other financial institutions, but according to the rule, "financial institution"-a distinction that includes "creditors"-is defined broadly. Very broadly. 

The Red Flags Rule defines a creditor as any entity with covered accounts that regularly extends, renews or continues credit; any entity that regularly arranges for the extension, renewal or continuation of credit; or any assignee of an original creditor that is involved in the decision to extend, renew or continue credit. 

In plain English, if you sell a product or service "on credit," the rule likely applies to you. That means actual financial institutions, auto dealers, mortgage brokers, utilities and telecommunications companies, just to name a few. Even nonprofits and government entities are not exempt. If a business defers payment for goods or services, it will be treated as a creditor-and must comply with the rule. 

(The FTC has argued that law firms are also creditors for purposes of the rule, but the Federal District Court in Washington ruled otherwise in early 2010-a decision that the FTC announced it will appeal. The FTC is also asserting that medical providers fall under the scope of the rule.)

To comply with this new legislation, businesses must develop a written program that identifies and detects the warning signs of identity theft. The program must spell out appropriate actions the company will take when it detects these "red flags," which fall into five general categories: (1) alerts, notifications or other warnings from a consumer reporting agency, (2) suspicious documents, (3) suspicious personally identifying information, such as a suspicious address, (4) unusual use of or suspicious activity relating to a covered account, and (5) notices from customers, victims of identity theft, law-enforcement authorities or other businesses about possible identity theft in connection with covered accounts.

A business can face serious consequences if it does not comply, including agency-imposed sanctions, lawsuits and reputation damage. Do not assume that existing risk policies and procedures will pass muster once the rule goes into effect at the end of the year. 

The regulation requires a separate identity theft prevention program, although it can reference other policies and procedures already in place to avoid unnecessary duplication. That program must meet certain criteria, including gaining approval by the board of directors (or a board committee) and stating who is responsible for program implementation and administration. Companies must also provide appropriate staff training that needs to be reviewed at least annually. If the company uses outside service providers-something most do-the program must also provide for oversight of them as well.

If the FTC or other governing agency finds an organization to be in violation of the rule, it will have an opportunity to show that it made a "reasonable effort" to comply.

____________

Neil B. Posner is chair of the Policyholders' Insurance Coverage group at Chicago-based Much Shelist.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2013 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.