May 24, 2012

Refugee Assistance Programs Hard Hit by Unemployment

 

As thousands of refugees enter the United States every year, the Department of Health and Human Services has struggled to resettle them and help them find jobs during the recession. Since refugees typically arrive without the basic essentials, the Office of Refugee Resettlement provides temporary assistance to refugees. In 2009, Congress appropriated over $400 million to support refugee resettlement programs for about 70,000 refugees accepted into the United States.

Refugee assistance programs provide cash and medical assistance as well as a broad range of social services, including employment assistance, English classes, naturalization services, and cultural adjustment services.

The percentage of employed participants declined in recent years, along with the economy in general. In 2007, 62 percent of refugees receiving cash assistance found employment within four to eight months. By 2009, the rate decreased to 41 percent.

Staff at volunteer agencies said the recession not only made it more difficult to find jobs, but an increasing number of refugees already employed had their hours cut or could only find temporary employment. Jobs that previously employed refugees, like the hospitality or construction sector, were increasingly filled by American citizens with more experience—unemployment nationwide topped 9 percent in 2009.

Different refugee assistance programs use a variety of approaches to assist new arrivals. Some provide services through a single agency in one location, while others refer refugees to a number of agencies for multiple services. There is little research or data on how to improve the economic condition of refugees and which approaches are most effective, according to a review by theGovernment Accountability Office. All refugee assistance programs have measures in common, but they collect information at different points in time.

“Little is known about the relative effectiveness of approaches used by ORR assistance programs in improving refugees’ economic status,” the GAO report said. “With refugees’ employment outcomes declining because of the recession and significant pressures on the federal budget, it is important that program providers use approaches that have been shown to be effective.”

FAST FACT: English proficiency is one of the most important factors influencing the economic status of refugees. Close to 90 percent of those who lacked an income and received cash assistance lived in a household where no one spoke English, according the ORR’s 2007 report to Congress.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

MISC.

  • The Department of Agriculture program to expand broadband service did not maintain its focus on rural communities. The agency issued 12 percent of its $895 million to communities near large metropolitan areas. The program also gave significant funds to assist competitive service in areas that already had broadband instead of expanding service to regions without any service. (USDA Inspector General)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.