Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Report Claims GOP Proposed Cuts Would Drop 37.5 Million People from Medicaid Rolls

As the election nears, experts and advocates are turning up the heat on dueling healthcare visions.  According to a study recently released by the Urban Institute for the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), the FY 2013 GOP House-passed budget plan to repeal President Obama’s ACA and restructure Medicaid as a block grant program would cut Medicaid spending by $1.7 trillion by 2022 and would result in dropping 37.5 million people from the Medicaid rolls. Vice Presidential hopeful Rep. Paul Ryan played a key role in formulating the FY 2013 budget plan including Medicaid block grant restructuring.  In response to media reports surrounding the release of the report, Romney’s campaign has stated, “Romney’s Medicaid plan differs from the one modeled in the report because it allows states to experiment with the program..."

The FY 2013 GOP budget proposed repealing the ACA and restructuring the Medicaid program from an entitlement based program to a block grant program.  The report, Medicaid and the Uninsured, determined that repealing the ACA would result in $932 billion dollars in savings and restructuring Medicaid to a block grant structure would save an additional $810 billion dollars, respectively.  The report assumed that state governments will be forced to reduce their increased Medicaid burden by steeply curtailing enrollment criteria in calculating the potential 37.5 billion people cut from the Medicaid rolls.  In Illinois, $53.8 billion dollars would be cut from Medicaid by 2022 equaling a reduction of 35% of Illinois’ total Medicaid funding.  Additionally, the report projected that almost 1.5 million Illinoisans would be dropped from Medicaid.

In a presidential election where health care reform and federal debt reduction are hotly contested issues, the experts are capitalizing on the uncertainty surrounding the effects of the ACA and the potential effects of competing GOP proposals by releasing strategically timed reports.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Heather Fesko Delgado is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Chicago office and a member of the firm’s Heathcare Department. Ms. Delgado practices exclusively in the healthcare transactional, regulatory and compliance areas.

312-338-5905

About the Author

Managing Partner of the Chicago Office

Mark Rust is Managing Partner of the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, and Chair of the firm’s national Healthcare Department. Mr. Rust concentrates his practice in transactional, regulatory and medical-legal issues affecting healthcare entities and provider organizations. For nearly 30 years he has written about or practiced in healthcare law, writing in a wide variety of publications from theJournal of the American Bar Association to USA Today. He is listed as a notable healthcare lawyer in Chambers USA, Top Healthcare Lawyers of...

312-214-8309

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.