May 24, 2012

A Report on Federal Corruption

A Federal government report reflects that in the first 10-plus months of 2011 government prosecutions have resulted in the conviction and sentencing of 82 individuals all working in the same industry. An additional 37 people in this industry have been convicted and await sentencing. The indictments of 50 more have been issued and these individuals await the adjudication of their cases.

The 119 who have been convicted of embezzling or otherwise stealing were caught taking more than $5.8 million which came from working men and women. The 82 who already have been sentenced to a total are to serve a total of nearly 40 years behind bars or in home confinement and must spend a total of nearly 200 years on probation.  

This industry is organized labor. Most of the crimes (both admitted and alleged) were against the working people organized labor purports to want to represent. The prosecutions were by the Obama Administration’s Justice and Labor Departments – thus, these were not part of some witch hunt by an anti-union administration. Rather, these “enforcement actions” were brought by one of the most labor friendly administrations in history. Nor was this an unusual level of activity in this area. Indeed, for much of the last decade the Justice Department has had to prosecute a similar magnitude of union officials and employees each year for various crimes – most typically embezzling or otherwise stealing union funds. 

The 2011 DOL listing of criminal enforcement actions is available here


Corruption Update

 

Curiously, a case involving the allegations of theft larger than any reported on the DOL website is omitted from the DOL's report. That case involved a UFCW Local in New York City and three of its union leaders who are alleged to have "extorted or stole over $2.4 million from the Union and employers whose employees belonged to the Union" over the period set forth in the indictment.

The United States Attorney's press release about the case can be found here.

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Scott J. Witlin is a partner in the Los Angeles office of Barnes & Thornburg and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department and the Entertainment and Music Practice Group. Mr. Witlin handles traditional labor and employment matters, including arbitrations, collective bargaining negotiations, compliance with various guild and union agreements, and union organizing campaigns. He represents clients in the entertainment and broadcasting, video game manufacturing, retail, consumer and industrial products, and transportation industries.

310-284-3777

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.