May 24, 2012

Retailers Beware: FACTA Spurs a Wave of Class Action Filings

Hundreds of class action lawsuits have recently been filed against retailers under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA). The law, which added new sections to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), was designed to minimize the risk of identity theft to consumers by requiring retailers to truncate credit and debit card information on receipts. If your business accepts credit or debit cards and issues printed receipts to customers, you should take steps to ensure that you are in compliance with the statute.

Under FACTA, the credit card number shown on the customer copy of an electronically generated receipt must be truncated and the expiration date must be omitted. The statute, enacted in 2004, became effective in phases. Immediate compliance was required for receipt machines put into use after January 1, 2005. However, for machines put into use before that date, the law required compliance by December 4, 2006. If you have one or more older machines, beware. The delay in FACTA's effective date has caught some retailers unaware.

Negligent FACTA violations are subject to an award of actual damages, attorneys fees and costs. Willful violations, on the other hand, are subject to an award of between $100 and $1,000 per violation plus attorneys fees, costs and punitive damages.

With astronomical recoveries as an enticement, it is not surprising that, most—if not all—of the class action cases that have been filed seek recovery for willful violations. With credit and debit card transactions by individual retailers numbering in the thousands per week, potential liability under the statute can quickly reach many millions of dollars for noncompliant retailers. As if class action suits were not enough, violators may also be subject to federal regulatory actions. In addition, credit card companies have reportedly begun to impose obligations on merchants to comply with FACTA, or else face steep fines.

It is a good idea to confirm, through a comprehensive internal audit, that credit card machines in use comply with the statute. If you find that changes need to be made, quick compliance is the key to reducing the amount of potential liability.
 
If you have questions about FACTA compliance or would like additional information on the recent class action filings, please contact Melinda Morales or your Much Shelist attorney.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Melinda J. Morales, a Principal in the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice group, represents both plaintiffs and defendants in a range of complex commercial litigation matters in state and federal courts. Her practice encompasses a wide variety of civil trial and appellate matters involving general business litigation, insurance coverage issues and class actions.

312-521-2434

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.