Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Revised Hart-Scott-Rodino Premerger Notification Thresholds for 2012

On January 24, 2012, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised Hart-Scott-Rodino Act (HSR) reporting thresholds under which transactions will be reportable only if, as a result of such transaction, the acquiring person will hold voting securities, assets, or non-corporate interests of the acquired person valued above $68.2 million, compared to $66.0 million in 2011. The newly adjusted thresholds will apply to all transactions that close on or after the effective date, which is expected to be in late February (the exact date will depend on when the changes are published in the Federal Register).

In summary, the relevant HSR thresholds are:

Threshold Original 
Amount
2012 Adjusted Threshold
Size of Transaction $50 million $68.2 million
Size of Person (if applicable) $10 million
and 
$100 million
$13.6 million and 
$136.4 million
Size of Transaction above which Size of Person Test does not apply $200 million $272.8 million

Corresponding increases will also apply to certain other thresholds and exemptions under the HSR Act. The complete list of revised HSR thresholds is available on the FTC's website (http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2012/01/hsr.shtm).

For reportable transactions, the acquiring person’s holdings must cross the threshold with respect to which the HSR notification is made within one year of the expiration or early termination of the HSR waiting period. Once the acquiring person has crossed the applicable threshold during the first year, any additional acquisitions by the same acquiring person of the same issuer’s voting securities will be exempt from notification during the five years following the expiration or early termination of the waiting period, up to the highest value of the threshold range for which the HSR notification was made. For purposes of this exemption, any subsequent acquisition by the acquiring person would be subject to the adjusted thresholds in effect when the subsequent acquisition is consummated.

Though recently there has been discussion about raising the HSR filing fees, for now they remain as follows:

2012 Adjusted Threshold Filing Fee
Transaction valued at greater than $68.2 million but less than $136.4 million $45,000
Transaction valued at greater than $136.4 million but less than $682.1 million $125,000
Transaction valued at $682.1 or greater $280,000
©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Andrew G. Berg is a Shareholder in the firm's Litigation Practice Group. He advises clients on litigation, mergers and acquisitions, and other antitrust and competition-related matters before the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, state attorneys general, and in private litigation. Mr. Berg's practice also includes a full range of antitrust transactional and mergers- and acquisitions-related experience including "Hart-Scott-Rodino" filings at the FTC and DOJ and related merger analysis issues. He also counsels and...

202.331.3181

About the Author

Of Counsel

Mary K. Marks practices in the areas of antitrust and competition counseling, with a focus on complying with and obtaining clearance under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act and global merger control and foreign investment laws for U.S. and multinational acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures. Mary advises transaction parties with respect to permissible pre-clearance and pre-closing activities. She also counsels clients regarding coordination and information sharing activities, and has been invited to participate in Federal Trade Commission discussions regarding HSR practice issues.

212-801-9200

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.