July 22, 2014

Rewards and Protections May Soon Be Available to Australian Qui Tam Whistleblowers

When Australia’s Parliament reconvenes after its September 7 federal elections, Nick Xenophon, an independent Senator representing South Australia, plans (if he is reelected) to introduce legislation designed to strengthen his country’s corporate whistleblower laws, according to the Sydney Morning Herald.  The legislation is planned to be styled after the United States’ False Claims Act, which allows for private citizens and organizations to bring suit on behalf of the government, share in any recovery, and benefit from significant legal protections afforded to those who blow the whistle.

False Claims Act-like legislation in Australia—an approach supported by the Tax Justice Network and one for which the Australian Federal Police Association has advocated since 2010—would help remedy defects in Australia’s Corporations Act.  Currently, Part 9.4AAA of the Corporations Act provides certain safeguards to some whistleblowers (corporate officers, corporate employees, corporate contractors, and employees of corporate contractors), but the Sydney Morning Herald reports that it does not extend protection to a number of categories of whistleblowers, including employees of small businesses and partnerships, and companies’ business partners.  Without safeguards like those afforded to False Claims Act whistleblowers in the United States, whistleblowers in Australia remain subject to retaliation by companies whose fraud they bring to light.

Independent accounts of fraud against the government in Australia reported on in the Canberra Times estimate significant sums of money are lost to fraud on an annual basis.  The Australian Institute of Criminology, for one, has estimated that nearly $500 million in fraud was committed by third parties against the national government for the years 2009 to 2010 and that less than $200 million of that number was recovered.  Other measures might yield significantly higher totals in Australia.  The Association of Certified Fraud Examiners approximates that five percent of government spending is lost to fraud annually; with Australia’s federal outlay of $375 billion in the current financial year, the total lost to fraud could be nearly $19 billion.

If Australia enacts legislation similar to the False Claims Act, it would follow other recent legislation encouraging whistleblowing in that country.  In July, the Public Interest Disclosure Bill was signed into law, which, according to the Wall Street Journal, protects whistleblowers who reveal wrongdoing—such as financial abuses or safety lapses—within the Australian government.  Although a positive measure, the most significant step Australia could take toward remedying (and preventing) fraud against its federal government would be to enact legislation comparable to the American False Claims Act targeted at fraud carried out by private actors.

Whatever the amount of money lost to fraud, it stands to reason that fraud against the government could be as problematic in Australia as it is in the United States.  Of the money actually recovered by Australia in the years 2009 and 2010, the Canberra Times reports that almost half was tied to fraud on federal aid programs such as Australia’s version of Medicare and social security.  The other half is likely attributable to banking fraud, government contract fraud, tax fraud, and other corporate fraud.  Just as corporate and Medicare whistleblowers in the United States have helped the government recover money, an effective False Claims Act-like law in Australia could provide private citizens and qui tam attorneys worldwide with the ability to do the same.

© 2014 by Tycko & Zavareei LLP

About the Author

Andrew J. Silver, Tycko & Zavareei Law Firm, Attorney

Andrew J. Silver graduated magna cum laude as a member of the Order of the Coif from Boston College Law School in 2012. While in law school, he was selected as an Articles Editor of the Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, for which he previously served as a Staff Writer. In 2007, Mr. Silver graduated from Tufts University with a B.A. in Economics and a concentration in Communication and Media Studies.

Prior to joining Tycko & Zavareei LLP, Mr. Silver worked as a student-attorney at the Boston College Legal Assistance Bureau, practicing housing law, family...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.