May 24, 2012

Rumors of Impending Gift Tax Changes Are Apparently Just Rumors, but Acting Soon Has Advantages

We have received a number of inquiries regarding rumors that the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (also known as the “super committee”) might cut back substantially on the current $5,000,000 lifetime gift tax exemption when it releases its deficit reduction plan by the November 23rd deadline. The most troubling part of those rumors was that the super committee might make that change effective as of that date (rather than at the end of 2011 or of 2012). The rumors are just rumors. However, if you are considering making substantial gifts to use that gift tax exemption, there are great advantages to acting now to preserve and protect wealth and transfer it to younger generations with minimal tax cost.

Executive Summary

The following is an executive summary of this new development; additional information is available from Vedder Price upon request:

·  Super Committee Deadline Is Approaching. The super committee is due to report its proposals on November 23, 2011.  If the super committee can reach an agreement on deficit reduction proposals, the deficit agreement reached earlier this year will give any super committee proposals expedited consideration in Congress.

·  Rumors of Super Committee Action on Gift Tax. For several weeks, Vedder Price has been tracking a rumor that the super committee would propose reducing the gift tax lifetime exemption from its current $5,000,000 level back to the $1,000,000 level that applied from early 2001 through 2010. Even more troubling, the rumor suggested that the super committee would make the changes effective as of November 23, 2011.

·  Reasons to Doubt the Rumors. Influential and well-connected lobbyists for the life insurance and banking industries have looked into this rumor and found it to be baseless, as have we. Additionally, under congressional budget scoring rules, any such change could not be made effective on November 23rd due to the time required for the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to “score” the proposals for their budgetary impact. While the rumor may have accurately described a worst-case, shortest-fuse scenario on how the super committee might act, there is no evidence that it will do so.

·    Advantages of Prompt Action. Nevertheless, persons who are ready, willing, and able to make substantial gifts, particularly as a year-end planning strategy, should consider accelerating their plans in case the super committee proposes reducing the lifetime gift tax exemption effective as of December 31, 2011. This is especially true for persons who would like to further leverage those gifts with a loan or installment sale, as the current lowest-ever Applicable Federal Rates are expected to begin increasing as early as December 2011. 

FEDERAL TAX NOTICE: Treasury Regulations require us to inform you that any federal tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Shareholder

Michael D. Whitty is a shareholder in the firm’s Tax & Estate Planning Group concentrating his practice in estate planning, taxation, and estate and trust administration.

Mr. Whitty represents principals of venture capital and private equity funds, key executives, investors and other wealthy individuals in planning for the preservation and transfer of their wealth. Specifically, he advises individual fiduciaries in the design or drafting of estate plans, wills, trusts, lifetime gifts, premarital agreement and other estate planning documents...

312-609-7812

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.