Advertisement

May 26, 2013

Russia Accedes to OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed a federal law acceding to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s anti-bribery convention on Feb. 1, 2012. Russia joins thirty-four other countries to have joined the convention. 

Russia criminalized foreign bribery in May 2011, and was invited to join the convention that same month. However, joining the convention was a condition that Russian was required to fulfill prior to joining the OECD. 

The bribery law signed in May 2011 is similar to the U.K. Bribery Act in terms of its scope and breadth. It criminalizes commercial bribery and prohibits both offering bribes to foreign government officials and accepting such bribes. It provides no exceptions for grease payments, and it does reach foreign entities doing business in Russia. Thus, as with several countries’ laws, entities that do business in Russia could be subject to liability under their own country’s law, as well as Russia’s. 

The law defines foreign government official to include any appointed or elected official who has a position in any legislative, executive, administrative, or judicial branch of a foreign country or an individual who serves any public function for a foreign country or a public agency or a public enterprise. As a result, it appears to encompass employees of government-owned enterprises, as the US Government has interpreted the US FCPA. 

The law also increased the penalties that may be imposed upon an individual or entity found in violation. Fines and the available ranges of incarceration under the new law vary depending upon the type of bribe and the official involved, and the court may prevent the offender from holding certain governmental or corporate positions in the future. 

The law had previously allowed considerable prison sentences for bribery (up to 12 years), but prison sentences were much more rare than fines. As a result, while the new law does impose stiffer penalties for violations, it remains to be seen exactly how strictly and aggressively the law will be enforced.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Harvey Cohen is a Partner in the Corporate Department and Chair of the International Business Practice Group. Harvey engages in a business and corporate law practice that includes the representation of non U.S.-owned entities; software, Internet, computer, development, ASP, B-2-B, outsourcing and high-tech agreements of all types; acquisitions and mergers; international business transactions including joint ventures, foreign subsidiaries and entities, and European, Canadian, Mexican, Latin American, Indian, and Chinese transactions; Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), Export Control...

513-977-8144

About the Author

Associate

Jacob A. Manning is a member of the Litigation Department. Jacob maintains a diverse litigation practice, and represents a wide variety of parties in civil litigation in state and federal courts in West Virginia, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. He has successfully represented clients before appellate courts in each jurisdiction.

In particular, Jacob focuses a significant portion of his practice on construction law and represents owners—particularly public entities—contractors, subcontractors, and material suppliers in litigation as well as during contract negotiations. Jacob...

304-230-1604

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.