May 24, 2012

SAIC Issued Administrative Measures for Corporate Debt-for-Equity Swap Registration

Responsive to issues faced with difficulty in obtaining financing by businesses (particularly small- to medium-size enterprises) due to the global financial crisis, State Administration of Industry and Commence officially released Administrative Measures for Corporate Debt-for-Equity Swap Registration (the “Measures”) recently, which formalizes regulation of debt-for-equity swap on the national level. The Measures will be put into implementation on January 1, 2012.

A debt-for-equity swap within the meaning of the Measures refers to the conversion of a creditor’s rights in the indebtedness owed to it by a limited liability company or joint-stock company established in China into equity by way of increasing the registered capital of such entity. The Measures apply to the following types of debts:

  1. Indebtedness arising from a contract between a creditor and a company in the course of business, provided that the creditor has performed all its contractual obligations giving rise  to the indebtedness and the swap will not violate any prohibitive provision of any laws, administrative regulations, measures of the State Council or the articles of association of the company;
     
  2. Debts pursuant to an effective judgment of a People’s Court; and
     
  3. Debts included in a reorganization plan as approved,  or a settlement agreement accepted and confirmed, by a People’s Court in connection with a bankruptcy reorganization or settlement of the debtor.

A company seeking to implement debt-to-equity swap shall apply to the company registration authority for change of registered capital and paid-up capital. In accordance with the Measures, the amount converted into equity from debt-for-equity swap when adding to other non-cash capital contribution shall not in the aggregate exceed 70% of the company’s registered capital, and shall not exceed the appraised value of the converted debts.

The Measures also requires that debts to be swapped for equity shall be appraised by legally established asset appraisal institutions, and equity swapped from debts shall be verified by legally established capital verification institutions for which capital verification certificates shall be issued.

The implementation of the Measures will alleviate the debt burdens of businesses after the financial meltdown and broaden financing channels available to them. At the same time, the Measures will effectively manage and mitigate potential risks facing businesses in the course of the debt-for-equity swap by requiring warranties by relevant parties, appraisal and capital verification,  and public disclosure of information, as well as imposing administrative penalties in accordance with relevant laws.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Associate

Josie Shi is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Shanghai Office. 

86.21.2321.6054

About the Author

Associate

Willow Wei is an associate in the Corporate Practice Group in the firm's Shanghai office.  Ms. Wei specializes in corporate finance and international intellectual property.

86.21.2321.6000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.