Advertisement

April 18, 2014

SEC Accuses Investment Adviser of Misrepresenting Its Algorithmic Trading Capacity

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a North Carolina-based investment adviser and its former owner with making false statements about the firm’s ability to engage in algorithmic currency trading.  

To procure a contract to manage a $17 million mutual fund, Elliott Shifman, the former owner of Chariot Advisors LLC (Chariot), allegedly told the fund’s board at two presentations in 2008 and 2009 that Chariot had a proprietary algorithm to trade in currencies. At the time of these statements, however, Chariot did not possess such capacity, and instead relied on an individual trader who used technical analysis combined with “her own intuition.” After two months, Chariot terminated this trader for poor performance and subsequently employed a third party that did use a computer algorithm to trade currency. 

Although Shifman’s representations as to Chariot’s algorithmic trading ultimately became true, the SEC has taken a hard line with respect to false statements made during the “15(c) process.” This process refers to the section of the Investment Company Act of 1940 that requires investment advisers to provide a registered fund’s board with all information necessary to evaluate the fund’s advisory agreements.   

The Chariot investigation, which resulted in the recently filed civil administrative proceeding, is the latest development in an initiative by the SEC’s Asset Management Unit to police interactions between funds and their advisers, and suggests that the 15(c) process will continue to be one of the agency’s priorities. 

In the Matter of Chariot Advisors, LLC and Elliott L. Shifman, A.P. No. 3-15433 (Aug. 21, 2013).

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Michael M. Rosensaft, Health Care Attorney, Katten Muchin Law Firm
Partner

Michael M. Rosensaft focuses his litigation practice on representing individuals and businesses in white collar criminal matters, regulatory enforcement matters, corporate internal investigations, insurance and health care fraud and complex civil litigation.

212-940-6631

About the Author

Tenley Mochizuki, Katten Muchin Law Firm, Litigation Attorney
Associate

Tenley Mochizuki concentrates her practice in litigation and dispute resolution matters.

212-940-8568

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation an