February 22, 2012

SEC Adopts Net Worth Standard for Accredited Investors

Introduction

On December 21, 2011, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted a final rule under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) that amends the net worth standard used in the definition of an “accredited investor.” Qualification as an accredited investor enables individuals to take part in certain non-public and limited securities offerings. This rule change conforms the net worth  standard under the Securities Act to the standard under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which has been effective since July 21, 2010. This note briefly describes the key features and implications of the new rule.

The Rule

Prior to the rule change, natural persons (individually or jointly with their spouses) qualified as accredited investors if their net worth exceeded $1MM.1 Under the newly adopted rule, the equity value of a person’s primary residence is excluded from the calculation of net worth.2 Specifically, the fair market value of a primary residence is not included as an asset in the net worth calculation, nor is debt secured by the residence included as a liability.3

Exceptions

The new rule does provide for certain exceptions.  First, any indebtedness secured by a primary residence that was incurred during the sixty-day period prior to the relevant sale of securities is included as a liability in the calculation of net worth—except if such indebtedness resulted from the acquisition of the primary residence4 (i.e., the indebtedness was a mortgage used to purchase the residence). Second, the excess of indebtedness secured by a primary residence over the fair market value of the primary residence is included as a liability, regardless of when such excess indebtedness was incurred or whether it is nonrecourse.5 In a release announcing the adoption of the final rule, the SEC explained that the above-described exceptions were adopted to prevent individuals from taking out home-equity loans for the purpose of acquiring other assets and thereby inflating their net worth.6

A third exception provides relief for persons who had previously acquired a right, such as an option or warrant, to acquire securities, which right they now can no longer exercise by virtue of not qualifying as an accredited investor under the new rule. This exception provides that, in connection with the exercise of such right, the value of a person’s primary residence will not be excluded from the net worth calculation if: (a) such right was held by the person on July 20, 2010, (b) the person qualified as an accredited investor on the basis of net worth at the time the person acquired such right and (c) the person held securities of the same issuer, other than such right, on July 20, 2010.7

Conclusion

This new rule represents a major change for individual investors. Home equity often constitutes the single largest asset for such investors. Accordingly, many individual investors will be unable to qualify for participation in private placements and other limited offerings of securities. The authors of the Dodd-Frank Act were of the view that the perceived illiquidity and risk profile of the securities sold in such placements and offerings are not suitable for certain individual investors. Whether the benefits of protecting these investors outweigh the costs remains to be seen.

____________________

1  Former 17 CFR 230.215(e) (limited offerings made exclusively to accredited investors) & 230.501(a)(5) (“Reg D” offerings).
2 17 CFR 230.215(e)(1) & 230.501(a)(5)(i).
3  Id.
4  17 CFR 230.215(e)(1)(ii) & 230.501(a)(5)(i)(B).
5  17 CFR 230.215(e)(1)(iii) & 230.501(a)(5)(i)(C); SEC Release No. 33-9287, at 13.
6  SEC Release No. 33-9287, at  11, 14.
7  17 CFR 230.215(e)(2) & 230.501(a)(5)(ii).

© 2012 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Partner

Cheri Hoff is a partner in the firm's Corporate and Securities section. Her practice focuses on providing advice to private investment funds, investors and advisers. Ms. Hoff forms and represents private funds, including hedge funds, private equity funds, funds of funds, and hybrid funds, with diverse strategies and structures. She handles a variety of regulatory and transactional matters for private investment funds and investment advisers. She provides operational, restructuring and related advice to her fund clients. In addition, she advises clients on SEC and...

212-508-6175
Associate

Keith Cooper is a member of the firm's tax section. His practice focuses on representation of funds and institutional investors in connection with acquisitions, dispositions, recapitalizations and joint ventures. Mr. Cooper has a broad background in partnership tax and corporate tax. During his career, he has represented large leveraged buyout funds, distressed debt funds, hedge funds, feeder funds, real estate funds, publicly traded partnerships, and institutional investors investing in each of the foregoing.
 
Mr. Cooper has structured and negotiated tax-free...

713.221.1149

About the Author

Associate

Anthony Wehrs’ practice focuses on advising private investment firms, corporations and financial institutions on mergers, acquisitions and the sale of corporate assets, private equity investments, financing arrangements, securities law compliance, corporate governance and general corporate matters in public and private takeovers, investments, restructuring and reorganizations in the U.S. and abroad.

212.938.6440

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.