May 24, 2012

SEC Makes Amendments to Regulation D and Related Revisions to Form D

In a final rule issued on February 6, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments to Regulation D and significant revisions to Form D that generally become effective September 15, 2008. Form D is filed with the SEC in connection with securities offerings that are exempt from federal registration under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, the commonly used federal basis for exempt private placement securities offerings.

The SEC has made the following revisions regarding Form D:

  • Filers will be permitted to identify all issuers in a multiple-issuer offering in one Form D filing.
  • The requirement to identify as "related persons" owners of 10% or more of a class of the issuer's equity securities has been deleted.
  • The requirement to provide a business description of the issuer has been replaced with a requirement to classify the issuer by industry from a pre-established list of industries.
  • Revenue range information for the issuer, or net asset value range information in the case of hedge funds and certain other investment funds, will be required (with an option to decline disclosure).
  • More specific information will be required regarding the exemption claimed by the issuer from registration under the Securities Act, as well as any exclusion claimed from the definition of "investment company" under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
  • Form D filers will be required to report the date of first sale in the offering and whether the offering is expected to last more than one year.
  • Amendments to a previously filed Form D will be required by reason of mistakes of fact, errors or changes to information, or the passage of one year.
  • Central Registration Depository (CRD) numbers will be required for both individual recipients of sales compensation and associated broker-dealers.
  • The current requirement to disclose information on a wide variety of expenses and applications of proceeds will be replaced with a requirement to report only expenses paid for sales commissions and finders' fees, as well as proceeds that are used for payments to executive officers, directors and promoters.
  • The current federal and state signature requirements will be replaced by a combined signature requirement that includes an undertaking to provide offering documents to regulators on request (subject to applicable law), a consent to service of process and a certification that the issuer is not disqualified by rule from relying on an exemption claimed.
  • A limited amount of free writing in "clarification" fields will be permitted to clarify certain information provided.

In addition to these important revisions, the SEC will require that Form D be filed electronically after March 16, 2009. Between September 15, 2008 and March 16, 2009, issuers may file Form D either electronically or on paper. The SEC is also adopting certain amendments to Regulation D in order to address concerns about general solicitation that could result from electronic filing and the corresponding greater public availability of Form D information over the Internet.

If you are involved in a company that is considering raising funds through an exempt private placement offering of securities, or otherwise have questions regarding how the SEC's amendments to Regulation D and the revisions to Form D might affect you, please contact your attorney.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Much Shelist is a full-service business law firm based in Chicago. Since our founding in 1970, and as we have grown to approximately 85 attorneys, we have nurtured a collaborative culture that emphasizes sophisticated, senior-level attention to client matters, combined with a collegial, creative atmosphere that allows us to deliver the highest level of service to every client. In addition, we are firmly committed to remaining independent, thus creating an environment of stability for our clients and our attorneys.

We serve as...

312-521-2000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.