May 24, 2012

SEC Proposes Increases in Individual Investor Financial Requirements

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently proposed increasing the financial requirements for individuals who can invest in certain private securities offerings. Twenty-five years ago, the SEC established criteria to protect investors by assuring that they had sufficient knowledge and financial experience to evaluate the merits and bear the economic risks of investing in certain securities offerings that were not required to be registered with the SEC. With that objective in mind, the SEC established the concept of an “accredited investor” and provided registration exemptions for securities offerings that are sold either exclusively to accredited investors, or to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors.

The accredited investor criteria, which are still in effect today, generally require that individuals have either $1 million in net worth (including equity in his or her personal residence) or $200,000 in annual income ($300,000 with spouse). According to the SEC’s new proposed rules, in addition to meeting this existing requirement, individuals would need to own at least $2.5 million in investments to invest in a "private investment vehicle," a category that includes hedge funds, private equity funds and other companies that themselves invest or trade in securities. If adopted in their current form, the SEC’s proposed rules would raise the eligibility bar for these types of investments and create a new category of individuals known as “accredited natural persons.”

The SEC’s rationale in seeking to impose these new financial requirements is based on the inflation that has occurred since the original accredited investor standards were established in 1982, as well as the dramatic rise in residential real estate values. The proposed rules also demonstrate the SEC’s concern with protecting investors from the unique risks associated with the increasingly complex landscape of hedge funds and other pooled investment vehicles. As the SEC notes in its proposed rules, comparable risks are not generally associated with other types of securities offerings. Furthermore, pooled investment vehicles often use complicated investment strategies and have minimal information available about them in the public domain.

To understand the manner in which the new standards would be applied, if adopted by the SEC in their current form, it is important to be aware of the following major points contained in the new proposed rules:

  • The $2.5 million in investments required under the proposed rules exclude the investor’s personal residence and any other real estate used by the investor for personal purposes or in connection with the conduct of a business, but includes any assets held in individual retirement accounts or similar retirement accounts.
  • In determining whether an individual meets the $2.5 million investment threshold, any outstanding indebtedness incurred in connection with the investment is to be deducted.
  • Only 50% of any jointly held investments will be considered in determining whether an individual meets the $2.5 million investment threshold; however, all jointly held investments and each spouse’s particular investments will be included if the investment in the private investment vehicle is being made jointly.
  • The new thresholds would not apply to venture capital funds, which are generally defined under the proposed rules as entities that invest a majority of their assets in developing companies to which they make available significant management assistance.
  • The new accredited natural persons standard would be indexed for inflation every five years.

If you have questions regarding how the SEC’s proposed rules might impact you, whether you are an individual investor or are involved in the management of an entity that would be considered a private investment vehicle, please contact your Much Shelist attorney.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Much Shelist is a full-service business law firm based in Chicago. Since our founding in 1970, and as we have grown to approximately 85 attorneys, we have nurtured a collaborative culture that emphasizes sophisticated, senior-level attention to client matters, combined with a collegial, creative atmosphere that allows us to deliver the highest level of service to every client. In addition, we are firmly committed to remaining independent, thus creating an environment of stability for our clients and our attorneys.

We serve as...

312-521-2000

Contributors

Much Shelist is a full-service business law firm based in Chicago. Since our founding in 1970, and as we have grown to approximately 85 attorneys, we have nurtured a collaborative culture that emphasizes sophisticated, senior-level attention to client matters, combined with a collegial, creative atmosphere that allows us to deliver the highest level of service to every client. In addition, we are firmly committed to remaining independent, thus creating an environment of stability for our clients and our attorneys.

We serve as...

312-521-2000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.