Advertisement

May 23, 2013

SEC Regulated Manufacturers Must Report Use of "Conflict Minerals"

On Aug. 22, 2012, the SEC adopted a final rule requiring SEC regulated manufacturers to report the use of “Conflict Minerals” in their manufactured products on a form to be filed with the SEC. Conflict Minerals are generally considered to be metals originating in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Conflict Minerals). The metals that are of particular concern include tin, tungsten, tantalum and gold. The first report is due on May 31, 2014 and is to report on the 2013 calendar year.

In performing due diligence for compliance with this rule, manufacturers should first identify whether these metals are contained in the manufacturer's products; then the manufacturer needs to determine from its supply chain(s) if the metals came from the Democratic Republic of Congo region. There are some exemptions for recycled or scrap minerals under the SEC rule, which a manufacturer should consider if applicable. Following the manufacturer's due diligence, the manufacturer determines if the products containing these metals are “DRC Conflict free,” “not DRC Conflict free,” or “DRC Conflict undeterminable” (during a 2 or 4 year phase-in period only).

For companies with good supply chain management and strong material safety database controls, this additional information gathering and reporting should not be unduly burdensome. However, the SEC rule requires reporting for calendar year 2013 by May 31, 2014. It is not too soon to determine if the SEC rule is applicable and to put the systems in place to gather the necessary information.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

We’ve been practicing environmental law since the mid-1970s – long before it became fashionable. Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Environmental Law Department has grown with the times, and represents business, governmental and utility clients of all sizes throughout the country in a wide range of environmental matters.

312-214-8310

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.