May 24, 2012

SEC Stays Proxy Access Rules

On October 4, 2010, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that it has stayed the effectiveness of its proxy access rules previously adopted by it. These rules are Rule 14a-11 and related amendments (including to Rule 14a-8), which were due to become effective on November 15, 2010 and to apply to the upcoming proxy season for issuers that mailed their 2010 proxy statements on or after March 13, 2010.

The SEC’s action was taken pursuant to its authority to exercise discretion to stay its rules pending judicial review if it determines “justice so requires,” and was made in response to a petition filed September 29, 2010 by the Business Roundtable and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (the “D.C. Circuit Court”) seeking to invalidate the new proxy access rules, and a related motion to stay Rule 14a-11 and associated amendments filed with the SEC. The Business Roundtable and U.S. Chamber of Commerce have asserted in these filings that the new proxy access rules are arbitrary and capricious and otherwise not in accordance with law; do not promote efficiency, competition and capital formation; exceed the SEC’s authority; and are unconstitutional (violating issuers’ rights under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution). The SEC’s actions do not address the merits of these claims.

While the SEC and the petitioners will seek expedited review by the D.C. Circuit Court, the impact of this stay on the 2011 proxy season remains unclear. An SEC spokesperson has stated that the SEC expects the legal issues will be resolved by “late spring,” which would effectively delay implementation of the new proxy access rules for at least one year for most companies. We will continue to monitor the status of this proceeding and any SEC rule changes for our clients.

Andrews Kurth looks forward to continuing discussions with our clients regarding the implementation and impact of proxy access, but we alert our clients that you may consider deferring final changes implementing proxy access (e.g., bylaw amendments) until these issues are resolved.

Please contact your attorney with any additional questions.

Click here for links to the SEC release ordering the stay (PDF).

Click here for a copy of the Petition for Review filed with the D.C. Circuit Court (PDF).

 

© 2012 Andrews Kurth LLP

About the Author

Partner

David has an extensive corporate and securities law practice emphasizing transactional and governance matters. His corporate finance practice includes representing both issuers and investment banks in initial public offerings and other public and private equity and debt offerings. He also advises companies, special committees and financial advisors concerning merger and acquisition transactions (both public and private). In addition, David regularly counsels public clients regarding compliance with periodic reporting, proxy solicitation, corporate governance matters and...

713.220.4301

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.