July 23, 2014

Section 409A Document Correction Relief: Take the Final Bite of the Apple before December 31st


Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 409A) regulates the payment of non-qualified deferred compensation. If a plan or agreement is not otherwise exempt from Section 409A and does not comply with its provisions, the amounts payable under such plan or agreement are immediately includable in income and subject to an additional 20% penalty tax. Deferred compensation may also be subject to interest penalties if early taxation occurs and the required income tax is not paid on time. There may be adverse tax consequences under state law as well. For example, California also imposes a 20% penalty tax on non-compliant deferred compensation arrangements.

The Timing of Payments Conditioned Upon Execution of a Release May Not Comply with Section 409A

Many deferred compensation arrangements, such as change of control plans and employment agreements providing for severance, require that the employee first execute a release of claims or return company property before receiving any of the payments under the agreement or plan.1 The Section 409A regulations do not allow individuals receiving deferred compensation payments to choose the year in which the payments begin. Based on this provision in the regulations, the IRS has taken the position that without restrictions around the timing of the execution of the release, the employee may execute or delay execution of the release in order to select the calendar year in which the payments will be made and, therefore, the arrangement may not comply with Section 409A.

Employers and Employees Have until December 31, 2012 to Correct Plans and Agreements That Run Afoul of the Strict Timing Requirements for Execution of Releases

In January 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-6, which provided an opportunity to correct certain documentary violations in order to reduce or avoid the adverse tax consequences under Section 409A, including plans and agreements that did not comply with Section 409A because the employee or service provider could control the timing of the payments conditioned upon an execution of a release. The relief provided under Notice 2010-6 was extended under IRS Notice 2010-80 with respect to plans and agreements in effect as of December 31, 2010.

Under Notice 2010-80, employers may amend plans and agreements that condition payments upon the execution of a release or other agreement to provide that the payments will be made at a certain time regardless of when the employee executes the release, as follows:

  • If the plan or agreement already provides that the payment will be made within a certain time period following the payment event, such as termination of employment, the agreement could be amended to provide that the payment will be made on the last day of the specified period, or if the specified period begins in one calendar year and ends in another, the payment will be made in the later calendar year.
  • If the plan or arrangement does not provide a specified period for payment, the amendment can provide either that the payment will be made on a fixed date or that the payment will be made during a specified period and if the period spans more than one calendar year, the payment will be made in the later calendar year.

Once the plan or agreement has been amended pursuant to the correction procedures in Notice 2010-80, the company must comply with certain information and reporting requirements regarding the correction. Specifically, the company is required to file an information statement regarding the correction with its federal income tax returns for the year in which the amendment was made.

Recommended Actions

Companies should review all of their deferred compensation arrangements to determine whether there are any actions that must be taken by the recipient of the payments prior to the commencement of such payments. If the plan or arrangement imposes such conditions, a company should take all necessary steps to ensure that the agreement or plan is amended to comply with Section 409A prior to December 31, 2012. Companies should also be sure to comply with the information and reporting requirements with respect to their federal income tax returns for the taxable years in which the corrections were made.

1 While this alert focuses on the timing of execution of releases prior to receiving payments under plans that are subject to Section 409A, the same analysis applies to payments conditioned upon the performance of various tasks such as the return of company property or the execution of non-competition, non-solicitation, or similar agreements.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Thomas M. Greene, Labor Law Attorney, Mintz Levin Law Firm

Tom’s practice focuses on the design, development, and implementation of executive compensation arrangements and employee benefit plans, including stock incentive plans, bonus plans, deferred compensation programs, SERPs, employment agreements, equity-based compensation packages, severance arrangements, and tax-qualified retirement and welfare plans.

His work in the area of employee benefit plans includes advising clients on compliance with the Internal Revenue Code and ERISA, fiduciary duties, mergers and acquisitions, and bankruptcy. Tom’s practice also involves...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.