Advertisement

May 26, 2013

Section 409A Transitional Relief Deadline Approaching

Deferred compensation arrangements under which payments subject to Section 409A are contingent on a release must be brought into compliance with documentation requirements by December 31.

The December 31, 2012, deadline is quickly approaching for amending affected deferred compensation arrangements to comply with the Code Section 409A documentation requirements that apply for payments that are contingent on execution (and, where applicable, nonrevocation) of a release of claims. The affected arrangements could potentially include equity, nonqualified retirement, and severance or employment arrangements. Employers need to identify and revise any noncompliant agreements before the December 31 deadline.

Background

On November 30, 2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2010-80, which provided guidance for correcting nonqualified deferred compensation plans under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Notice 2010-80 modified provisions in Notice 2008-113 (regarding 409A operational failures) and Notice 2010-6 (regarding 409A documentary failures).[1]

IRS Notice 2010-80 provides transitional relief through December 31, 2012, for Section 409A documentary failures involving payment arrangements that are contingent on the execution of a release (such as a severance payment that is subject to Section 409A and is contingent on execution of a release of claims). The IRS takes the position that an arrangement providing for payments of Section 409A deferred compensation to be made subject to execution of a release may allow for the possibility that an employee could manipulate the year in which payment is made by accelerating or delaying the execution and delivery of the release. Where the employee can thereby exercise control over the year of payment, the IRS has indicated that such a provision would violate the prohibition on an employee directly or indirectly designating the calendar year of payment for a payment of deferred compensation subject to Section 409A, thus triggering an automatic Section 409A violation.

IRS Notices 2010-6 and 2010-80 offer corrective relief by providing that such documentary failures can be corrected by either of the following methods:

  • Providing for payment on a fixed date (such as on the 60th day following separation) so that delivery of the release does not affect payment timing.
  • Providing that any payment that could be paid over a release consideration and revocation period beginning in one taxable year and ending in the subsequent taxable year will be paid in the subsequent taxable year (again, so that release delivery does not affect payment timing).

Applicable transition relief under IRS Notice 2010-80 requires that payments under an arrangement with a nonconforming release provision triggered between March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2012, must be administered by paying in the later taxable year where an applicable release period spans two taxable years.

Any deferred compensation arrangement under which payments of deferred compensation subject to Section 409A are contingent on a release must be amended by December 31, 2012, to comply with the requirements of Section 409A, generally using one of the two methods described above. Only arrangements that are subject to Section 409A (and for which no exemption is applicable) are affected by these requirements. Accordingly, exempt short-term deferral (vest and pay) amounts, or exempt separation pay, generally do not involve this compliance issue because the rule regarding employee influence over year of payment applies only to payments of Section 409A deferred compensation (and not to exempt amounts).

Actions Needed

Employers should review compensation arrangements that provide payments that are contingent on execution of a release, if they have not done so already, in order to identify and correct any noncompliant provisions as necessary in advance of the December 31, 2012, deadline for amendment.

Copyright © 2013 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Daniel L. Hogans is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice, resident in the Washington, D.C. office.

Mr. Hogans focuses his practice on handling a variety of benefits and compensation matters, including equity and incentive compensation plans, employment arrangements, nonqualified deferred compensation plans, ERISA, qualified retirement plans, and pension and profit-sharing plans. He also has an extensive background in matters involving ESOPs (and related S corporation issues) and general business counseling.

...

202.739.5510

About the Author

Associate

George Y. Tsai is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. Attorneys in this practice represent a wide range of clients, from small startup companies and family-owned businesses to Fortune 500 firms. We also represent financial institutions, fund companies, investment managers, and other service providers in connection with their business activities involving healthcare plans. Our services include assistance with the design of all types of compensation and benefits plans, advice on regulatory compliance, assistance with self...

215.963.5060

Contributors

Partner

Mims Maynard Zabriskie is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice, resident in the Philadelphia office. Ms. Zabriskie designs and helps clients implement executive compensation programs, equity compensation plans such as stock option plans and tax-qualified retirement plans. Ms. Zabriskie counsels clients on a wide variety of legal issues that arise in connection with employee benefit plans. Ms. Zabriskie has an extensive background in working with Fortune 500 companies, technology and bio-tech companies and other publicly...

215-963-2921

About the Author

Partner

David B. Zelikoff is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. Mr. Zelikoff is experienced in all facets of employee benefits and executive compensation, including qualified plans, nonqualified deferred compensation plans and arrangements, equity compensation plans, employee benefits issues in mergers and acquisitions, employment matters, securities issues relating to employee benefits and executive compensation, executive compensation issues for REITs, and welfare plans.

Mr. Zelikoff is also actively involved in pension...

215.963.5360

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.