May 24, 2012

SEIU Turning Its Organizing Efforts to Interns, Residents & House Staff - Is Your Hospital Ready?

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

Unions are getting more aggressive about organizing residents, interns and house staff working at hospitals. For the last decade, the law has been that medical interns and residents are considered employees under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and have the right to join a union and engage in collective bargaining. Boston Medical Center, 330 NLRB 152 (1999). Since that decision, there has been little successful effort to organize this unique group of medical providers. In addition, the entire issue was overshadowed when a Republican-dominated NLRB ruled that university teaching assistants are not statutory employees with collective bargaining rights under the NLRA. Brown University, 342 NLRB 483 (2004). Residents and house staff are enough like teaching assistants to put the Board's 1999 decision in doubt. That is no longer the case.

Recently, the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) filed a petition for an election among the St. Barnabas Hospital's interns, residents and fellows, or house staff, at its hospital in New York City. The Labor Board's Regional Director directed an election among this petitioned-for group. The Hospital appealed that decision to the newly-composed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), arguing the NLRB should reject such a petition because so many of the persons involved were like teaching assistants and that the 2004 Brown University decision was applicable to this election case.

The NLRB rejected the Employer's claim that it should have considered the applicability of, which found that, noting that Boston Medical Center remains the law and that Brown's reasoning had not been extended to cases involving medical house staff. St. Barnabas Hospital (2-RC-23356; 355 NLRB No. 39) (June 4, 2010).

Given the SEIU's increased efforts at organizing such health care provider groups, teaching hospitals, as well as other hospitals who use house staff, are well-advised to consider what efforts they are making to avoid the possible unionization of this critical component of their health care delivery.

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Anna M. Dailey is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Law Department. Anna's practice involves all facets of labor law issues, including defeating union organizing campaigns, representation hearings, contract negotiations, arbitrations, unfair labor practices, strikes, and successorship questions. Her practice also includes advising and defending corporations on employment issues including discrimination charges, wrongful discharge litigation and advice on handling employment decisions and representing clients in state and federal jury trials. Anna has handled numerous internal...

304-357-0923

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.