April 20, 2014

Seizure of Electronic Data: European Commission Dawn Raid Inspection Guidance Revised

In an era when the vast majority of written communications are made by electronic means, a company’s obligations to cooperate with Commission officials in an “antitrust dawn raid” extend to the granting of access to all electronically stored data.  This is emphasised in the Commission’s revised guidelines on conduct of “dawn raids,” published on 18 March 2013.

Every company is subject to the possibility of an unannounced inspection (“dawn raid”) by the European Commission.

Obstruction of a dawn raid can expose a company to fines, irrespective of whether or not it was involved in an antitrust infringement.  In an era when the vast majority of written communications are made by electronic means, a company’s obligations to cooperate with Commission officials extend to the granting of access to all electronically stored data.  This is emphasised in the Commission’s revised “Explanatory note to an authorisation to conduct and inspection in execution of a Commission decision under Article 20(4) of Council Regulation No 1/2003” (the revised note) published on 18 March 2013.

In a thinly veiled reference to the EUR 2.5 million fine imposed recently on Energetický a průmyslový holding and EP Investment Advisors (companies active in the energy sector in the Czech Republic) which failed to secure certain of their own electronic data (Commission Decision of 28 March 2012 in Case COMP/39.793 EPH and Others), the revised note makes it clear that companies must not interfere with Commission officials gathering electronic data.

The revised note contains the following important changes:

  • For the first time, it is stated explicitly that a company under investigation must make its IT staff available to assist Commission officials with, among other things, temporarily blocking email accounts, temporarily disconnecting running computers from the network, removing and re-installing hard drives from computers and providing support through “administrator access rights”. 
  • The revised note provides a broader list of the potential types of storage media that may be accessed and search tools that may be used during a dawn raid.  It likewise makes it clear that the Commission can use a broad range of hardware, either its own or that of the company under investigation. 
  • The revised note clarifies that the rules apply to Commission “officials” and “other accompanying persons authorised by the Commission to conduct the inspection”, including national regulators.  Since the officials and the other accompanying persons enjoy practically the same authority during inspections, these two categories are now collectively called “inspectors”.  This effectively puts companies on notice that they are obliged to cooperate with both Commission and national inspectors, and their authorised IT personnel.

The revised note comes in the wake of recent judicial decisions confirming the Commission’s power to seize electronic data.  It signals that the Commission will continue to take a broad approach to the seizure of electronic data, and spells out the cooperation that will be demanded from staff of the company under investigation.  By updating the explanatory note, the Commission has confirmed that it will not tolerate action that could undermine the effectiveness of its investigations.

Companies are accordingly advised strongly to take stock of these developments in connection with their own antitrust compliance and readiness for dawn raids.

© 2014 McDermott Will & Emery

About the Author


Andrea Hamilton is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP based in its Brussels office.  She is a member of the Antitrust and Competition Practice Group.  Formerly based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C. office, she has extensive experience practicing before the European Commission, Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice. 

32 2 282 35 15

About the Author

David Henry is an associate in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office.  His practice focuses on European competition law including merger control, cartels and abuse of dominance, and his clients include companies in the air transport, chemicals, electronics and semi-conductor products, food retailing and digital map industries.  He also advises clients in proceedings before the European courts. 

32 2 282 35 69

Martina Maier is a partner in the international law firm of McDermott Will & Emery, based in its Brussels office. Martina is head of the firm’s European Antitrust and Competition Practice Group and her practice focuses on German and European competition law, including State aid, single firm conduct, merger control and agreements restricting competition.   She has extensive experience in representing clients in a broad range of industries before the European Commission and national competition authorities and courts.

32 2 282 35 66

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.