Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Senate Finance Committee Takes an In-Depth Look at Health Care Fraud & Abuse

Earlier this week, I discussed the HHS and DOJ Annual Report for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Program.  HHS and DOJ are not the only ones who are determined to purge the health care industry of its woes.   On January 31, 2013 a group of six current and former members of the Senate Finance Committee released a comprehensive report detailing recommendations on combating waste, fraud and abuse in the Medicare and Medicaid Programs.

The Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicare and Medicaid, was led by current Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking Member Orrin Hatch (R-UT). They were joined by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Tom Carper (D-DE). Together this group solicited recommendations from 164 health care industry experts across the country. According to Baucus, the Committee received over 2,000 pages of input and ideas from the nation’s health care community which offered common sense solutions to strengthen Medicare and Medicaid.

The work for the report started last May when the bipartisan lawmakers invited interested stakeholders to submit white papers offering recommendations and innovative solutions to improve program integrity, strengthen payment reforms, and enhance fraud and abuse enforcement tools. Some of the suggested changes to the system include:

  • Increasing state Medicaid anti-fraud program funding
  • Requiring the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to use currently un-utilized statutory authorities, such as mandatory compliance programs
  • Clarifying appropriate settings for care (inpatient vs. outpatient, for example)
  • Eliminating duplicative federal and state Medicare/Medicaid anti-fraud programs
  • Creating an advisory panel to provide clinical input as a component of contractor oversight

The Committee’s work is not over. They intend to work with key Committees of jurisdiction, the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”), and the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (“HHS-OIG”) and industry stakeholders to develop a more detailed list of recommendations and actions. It is notable that some of the suggested changes are within CMS’ authority and will not require legislation.

Regardless of what side of the aisle they are on, it appears lawmakers are committed to improving Medicare and Medicaid for the taxpayers. The report, according to Senator Wyden, represents what can be accomplished when Senators work together with the private sector.

© 2013 by McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Christopher Shaughnessy is a Associate of McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC.  Mr. Shaughnessy concentrates his practice area in health care law and is located in the firm’s Lexington office.

859-554-4414

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.