May 24, 2012

Sharing Family Medical History Disclosed by Patients Without Consent of Family Doesn't Violate HIPAA According to Feds

Imagine that you are a health care provider covered by the HIPAA privacy rule. Also imagine that your patient shares with you certain aspects of her family’s medical history which may be relevant to your treatment of the patient. Finally, imagine that another health care provider later asks you to disclose all or some of that patient’s family medical history for purposes of treating one of those family members.

Once you have this family medical history in your records, are you allowed to disclose it in the same manner, and under the same circumstances, that you’d be free to disclose the patient’s personal “protected health information” without first obtaining the consent of the family members whose medical history now rests in your records? Well, apparently you can. So says the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) in a new HIPAA “Frequently Asked Questions” (“FAQ”) document released on January 7, 2009.

The HIPAA privacy rule limits how covered health care providers may use or disclose protected health information (“PHI”) of their patients. However, under that rule, a provider may disclose PHI (except psychotherapy notes) to third parties for purposes of treatment, payment and certain health care operations purposes, without obtaining the consent of the patient to the PHI disclosure. According to OCR, when a covered health care provider obtains a patient’s family medical history, that information becomes part of the patient’s medical record, and his PHI. Thus, any HIPAA privacy rights in that information belong to the patient, not his family members. OCR also says that the privacy rule’s authorization to disclose PHI, without consent of the patient, for purposes of “treatment” extends to treatment of others besides just the patient who provided the information, including members of his family. So, a provider may disclose a patient’s family medical history to another health care provider for purposes of treating the patient’s family member without consent of the patient or the family member.

© 2009 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Ken is a long term care attorney advising clients on a wide variety of legal planning issues arising in the skilled nursing facility setting, assisted living setting, and other spheres of long term care. He is a frequent national lecturer and author of industry manuals, national trade journal magazine articles and similar training tools. He serves Poyner Spruill clients by focusing on legal issues impacting the long term care and health services sector. Ken also serves as head of Poyner Spruill's Health Law Section.

Representative Experience

  • Served...
(919) 783-2917

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.