May 24, 2012

Small Business Jobs Act Offers Tax Incentives

In addition to expanding lending to small businesses, the Small Business Jobs Act ("SBJA"), effective September 27, 2010, also includes several tax provisions which aim to encourage investment, promote entrepreneurship and provide small business relief. The following is a brief summary of some of the most significant tax provisions included in the SBJA:

  • Increased and Expanded Section 179 Expensing. Under SBJA, qualifying businesses can now expense up to $500,000 of section 179 property for tax years beginning in 2010 and 2011. Without SBJA, the expensing limit for section 179 property would have been $250,000 for 2010 and $25,000 for 2011. The SBJA also increases the section 179 investment ceiling to $2,000,000 (up from $800,000 in 2010). This means that a taxpayer can spend up to $2,000,000 on Section 179 property for years starting in 2010 and 2011 before triggering a reduction to the $500,000 expense limitation. Additionally, SBJA expands the definition of Section 179 property to include certain real property, including: certain leasehold improvements, restaurant property and retail improvement property and allows businesses to claim $250,000 of Section 179 expense on it.
     
  • Bonus Depreciation Extended. The SBJA also extends the 50% first-year special depreciation allowance provision (i.e., “bonus depreciation”) that had expired at the end of 2009 through December 31, 2010. Bonus depreciation on property with a recovery period of 10 or more years (e.g., certain long-lived assets and transportation property) is extended through 2011. The 50% first-year special depreciation allowance provides an additional means by which businesses can accelerate a deduction by expensing (a portion of) the cost of property that would otherwise be spread out over a number of years.
     
  • Increased Deduction for Start-Up Expenditures. In addition, the SBJA doubles the amount of start-up expenditures that may be deducted in the year incurred from $5,000 under current law, to $10,000 for tax years beginning in 2010. Additionally, the investment ceiling is increased from $50,000 to $60,000.
     
  • Five-year carryback for general business credits. Prior to the enactment of SJBA, a business's unused general business credits could be carried back to offset taxes paid in the previous year only, and the remaining amount could be carried forward for 20 years to offset future tax liabilities. Under SJBA, for the first tax year of the taxpayer beginning in 2010, eligible small businesses can carry back unused general business credits for five years instead of just one. Eligible small businesses are sole proprietorships, partnerships and non-publicly traded corporations with $50 million or less in average annual gross receipts for the prior three years.
     
  • Use of general business credits to offset AMT for 2010. Under the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT), taxpayers can generally only claim allowable general business credits against their regular tax liability, and only to the extent that their regular tax liability exceeds their AMT liability. The SBJA allows eligible small businesses to use all types of general business credits to offset their AMT in tax years beginning in 2010.
© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Jacklyn D. Olinger is a member of the Corporate Department. Jacklyn's practice focuses on issues related to nonprofit organizations, including formation, obtaining and maintaining tax exempt status, and corporate governance matters. Jacklyn's practice also includes taxation and employee benefits matters.

513-977-8335

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.