September 19, 2014
September 18, 2014
September 17, 2014
September 16, 2014
Supreme Court Issues Opinion Reinstating Important Tool for Employers to Defeat Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Collective Actions
In a major victory for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion on April 16, 2013, confirming employers' ability to make an "offer of judgment" to named plaintiffs who are pursuing collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
In Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk, U.S. No. 11-1059 (Apr. 16, 2013), the Court held that when an employer's offer of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68 fully satisfies the named plaintiff's FLSA claims, and no other plaintiffs have opted in, the claims become moot and the court must dismiss the entire lawsuit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Obviously, the ability to make an offer of judgment to named plaintiffs for the purpose of defeating a class action before it gains traction is a tremendous defensive tool for employers. Genesis HealthCare effectively overrules a recent decision from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which precluded the use of Rule 68 offers of judgment to "pick off" named plaintiffs early on in FLSA collective actions. See Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless, 553 F.3d 913 (5th Cir. 2008).
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Brooklyn Federal Court Judge Reiterates and Expands on Prior Opinion Regarding Plaintiff’s Attorneys’ Fees
- Third Circuit Joins Second Circuit In Rejecting Vague Pleadings of FLSA Violations
- Most Convenient Forum is State of Company Headquarter, Tennessee Federal Judge Finds in Collective Action
- Supreme Court Rejects “Presumption of Prudence,” Adopts New Pleading Standards in Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer
- California Supreme Court Gives Employers Added Protection Against Wage-and-Hour Class Actions
- Ninth Circuit Says Disability Plan Participant’s Claim Is Time-Barred