May 24, 2012

Supreme Court Will Hear Challenge to ACA

The Supreme Court will hear a challenge to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Court announced today. The Court decided to review three of the five appeals before it, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision, which struck down the insurance mandate in a divided three-judge panel.

The Supreme Court will address the following issues:

  • The constitutionality of the insurance mandate;
  • Whether some or all of the ACA must fail if the insurance mandate is struck down;
  • The constitutionality of the Medicaid program expansion; and
  • Whether the Anti-Injunction Act bars some or all of the challenges to the ACA.

The cases will not be grouped together. However, the Supreme Court scheduled 5½ hours for oral argument on the above issues, to be held in March 2012. The time allotted for oral argument appears to be a record, with the closest case, a 2003 case involving the constitutionality of campaign finance law, being allotted 4 hours for oral argument.

The Health Law team at von Briesen will continue to monitor and report on the progress of the ACA challenge, including oral argument and the Supreme Court’s decision, which is expected late in June 2012.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Meghan O’Connor is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Her practice focuses on general health law including managed care and provider contracting, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

Prior to joining von Briesen, Meghan worked for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services where she consulted with states regarding federal health law, regulation and policy, evaluating managed care contracts and conducting compliance reviews.

414-287-1586

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.