Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Taking a Bite Out of Bed Bug Litigation - A Strategic Plan May Be the Best Defense

Greenberg Traurig
Tara K. Gorman
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Real Estate
All Federal
Printer-friendly
Email this Article
Download PDF
Reprints & Permissions

Litigation against hotel owners due to bed bug infestation is running rampant.  The best way to take a bite out of a bed bug claim, may just be to bite back with a good strategic defense plan before the problem arises.  Let’s face it - there is a huge “ooogh” factor when it comes to bed bugs.  Bed bugs are small nocturnal animals that are flat until they bite and suck human blood and puff up - ooogh!  Of course hotel guests would be unwelcoming to bed bugs.  The first line of defense to a bed bug claim is to train your staff to take complaints seriously.  A guest who feels that the hotel is not taking the complaint seriously, may just run to the lawyer and file a claim.  The second step is to have a plan to monitor bed bug infestation and bite back with a protective plan before the bed bugs can get the better of your hotel - and in turn your bottom line.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Tara K. Gorman
Shareholder

Tara K. Gorman focuses her practice on general commercial real estate transactions, including commercial real estate acquisitions and sales, hotel acquisitions, operations, development and finance, office leasing, various financing transactions involving lender and borrower representation and telecommunications and access matters on behalf of building owners and managers.

gormant@gtlaw.com
202-530-8519
www.gtlaw.com

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.