Advertisement

June 18, 2013

TCEQ “Compliance History” Rule Change to Affect Regulated Facilities in Texas

At the direction of the Texas Legislature, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which oversees regulatory compliance for 280,000 entities, has for the last decade provided “compliance history” regulations that generate a score for each regulated facility in the state based generally on the number and severity of violations the facilities have faced through environmental enforcement actions. TCEQ uses these scores as a public “report card” for regulated entities, as well as in permitting decisions, enforcement, announced inspections, and participation in innovative or voluntary programs.

In response to criticisms of the existing compliance history scoring program and at the Legislature’s direction, TCEQ adopted a rule on June 27, 2012 modifying the components and formula for compliance history calculations. This change marks the first material change to the compliance history program since its creation in 2002.

Several substantial changes were made to a variety of factors that will greatly affect how owners and operators’ compliance history scores and classifications are determined. These include:

  • Compliance Time Frame
  • Violations in Other States
  • Site Classifications
  • “Person” Company-wide Classifications
  • Compliance History Scale and Formula
  • Right of Review and Appeal
  • Timing
  • Elimination of “Average by Default”

For a more detailed discussion of these changes, click here

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.