May 25, 2012

Thirteen NC Counties Set to Revalue in 2012

Counties in North Carolina are required to revalue real property every eight years; however, some counties chose to do so in shorter intervals.  According to the North Carolina Department of Revenue, thirteen counties are set to revalue in 2012, including Bertie, Cabarrus, Cherokee, Franklin, Guilford, Madison, Montgomery, New Hanover, Pamlico, Pitt, Rutherford, Surry and Watauga.  In these counties, taxpayers will receive revaluation notices based on the value of their real property as of January 1, 2012.  These notices are typically mailed in late January or February and provide taxpayers an opportunity to appeal.  In revaluation years, counties typically encourage taxpayers to go through an informal review process prior to filing a formal appeal.

Formal appeals are heard by each county’s Board of Equalization and Review (“BOER”), which are usually comprised of local citizens and appraisers appointed by the Board of County Commissioners.  By statute, each county’s BOER must convene between the first Monday in April and the first Monday in May and must adjourn by December 1 in revaluation years and July 1 in non-revaluation years.  All appeals must be filed prior to the adjournment date of the BOER.  The adjournment date for each county’s BOER will vary in each county.  Therefore, taxpayers who are dissatisfied with their property valuation should contact their county tax office immediately upon receipt of the revaluation notice to find out when the BOER is scheduled to adjourn.

In non-revaluation years, taxpayers will not receive a reminder about their tax value until they receive their tax bill.  Oftentimes, the tax bill is received after the appeal period for that year has expired.  Therefore, taxpayers who want to appeal their tax value in a non-revaluation year, should do so early in the year and certainly before April 1.  Appeals in non-revaluation years are limited in scope and require the taxpayer show that the value exceeds the market value as of the date of revaluation.  For example, a taxpayer who appeals a value that was assessed in 2008, would have to show that the value exceeds the property’s fair market value as of January 1, 2008.  This is true even if the appeal is lodged in 2012.  Data, sales and market conditions between January 1, 2008 and 2012 would be not be appropriate evidence for the taxpayer to use in support of their value.  Any relief provided to a taxpayer in a non-revaluation year is only prospective and is not retroactive.

All BOER decisions can be appealed to the North Carolina Property Tax Commission (“PTC”).  Proceedings before the PTC are judicial in nature and both parties, the taxpayer and county, are allowed to present witnesses that are subject to cross-examination.  These witnesses are typically in the form of expert real estate appraisers.  Parties are also allowed to conduct discovery in advance of the hearing before the PTC.  Decisions of the PTC can be appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. 

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Chad primarily represents land owners, developers and local governments in state and federal court on a myriad of land-use and zoning issues including vested rights, constitutional matters and zoning ordinance interpretations. He also represents land owners and developers before local Boards of Adjustment, Planning Commissions, City Councils, and County Commissioners on matters related to zoning, permitting, variances, annexations, special use permits, site plans, subdivisions and road closings.

Chad has experience representing clients in administrative and civil dispute resolution...

(919) 783-2896

About the Author

Partner

Keith’s practice centers on development or redevelopment of property, and the environmental, utility and land use issues that arise from development projects.

He assists developers and local governments with the planning, permitting and construction of a variety of projects, including convention centers, parks and other public projects, residential developments, and marinas.  He especially enjoys “brownfields” projects, redeveloping contaminated property.  This work in part involves assisting clients with compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act...

(919) 783-1013

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.