May 25, 2012

Time for Corporations to Get Ready to Issue Annual ISO/ESPP Information Statements and File New Information Returns with Irs; Irs Releases New Forms and Instructions

In January 2011, Employers must furnish each employee who exercised incentive stock options ("ISOs") or sold or otherwise transferred shares acquired under an employee stock purchase plan ("ESPP") during 2010 with a detailed information statement by January 31, 2011, and must also file an information return with the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") by February 28, 2011 (March 15, 2011 for corporations filing electronically).

As discussed in our January 11, 2010 blog article and November 19, 2009 blog article, the IRS issued new final regulations in 2009 regarding the information return and information statement requirements under Section 6039 of the Internal Revenue Code. Although the final regulations apply as of January 1, 2007, employers were not required to file an information return with the IRS for stock transfers that occurred during 2007, 2008 or 2009 (although employers were required to provide an information statement to employees with respect to stock transfers that occurred during those years). Additionally, employers had the option of continuing to rely on the prior 2004 final regulations or the 2008 proposed regulations, as opposed to following the new 2009 final regulations. The current year 2010 represents the first year during which employers must comply with the new 2009 final regulations and must file an information return with the IRS, in addition to providing an information statement to employees.

The IRS recently issued two new forms (Form 3921 for ISO transactions and Form 3922 for ESPP transfers), which must be used to satisfy the information return requirement and can be used to satisfy the information statement requirement (a substitute form can be used for the information statement only). The instructions to the new forms also reference the IRS General Instructions for Certain Information Returns, which includes additional information, such as when an employer must file electronically and when an account number is required for a recipient.

The failure to timely file a required information return can subject an employer to a penalty of up to $50 per information return, up to a maximum of $250,000 per year (subject to certain exceptions); while the penalty for the failure to timely furnish a required information statement is equal to $50 per return, up to a maximum of $100,000 per year.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Sheppard Mullin's securities and corporate finance practice includes a seasoned team of securities attorneys who represent a wide range of public companies and investment bankers. Our attorneys have significant experience in all areas of regulatory compliance and disclosure under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and capital formation under the Securities Act of 1933. We advise on corporate governance issues and have extensive experience advising boards, audit committees, compensation committees and nominating and governance committees of public companies. Our securities practice also...

202-469-4941.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.