May 25, 2012

Tips To Get A New Market Tax Credit Commitment

On February 24, 2011, the federal government announced the award of $3.5 billion in new market tax credit allocations to community development entities (or "CDEs").  A CDE is essentially an intermediary through which a bank loans funds in order for the bank to receive the 39% federal new market tax credit.  I talked about how the new market tax credit program works in a prior blog post:http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2010/08/new-possibilities-in-the-hunt-for-financing

Notably, 6 of the 99 allocatees referenced in their profile that they focus on renewable energy projects. My own personal experience with several other allocatees suggests that other allocatees are also eager to loan to renewable projects even if not highlighted in their profiles.  A full list of the recent awardees is available at:http://www.cdfifund.gov/docs/2010/nmtc/2010NMTCProgramAllocateeProfiles.pdf

Given the massive new round of allocations, a renewable energy developer should make sure it considers new market tax financing in the sources and uses.  To maximize the likelihood of securing a commitment of credits from a CDE, the following tips are recommended:

1.         Timing.  A developer should talk to a CDE about a new market tax credit commitment 4 to 9 months before the developer wants to close on the financing.  On one hand, the diligence process for a new market tax credit financing can take several months (much like a commercial loan) so the discussions should start 4 months away.  On the other hand, it may be futile to talk to a CDE too far in advance.  This is because tax rules generally require CDEs to commit 85% of their new market credits within 12 months of receipt of the credit allocation.  Thus, a typical CDE wants to finance projects that can close as soon as possible.  Developers that are more than 9 months away from a realistic closing date for new market financing will have trouble getting a CDE's attention. 

2.         Offtake.  Even more so than a commercial lender, a new market tax credit lender can not accept the possibility of a default.  This is because such a default generally can result in vicious tax penalties to the tax credit investor on top of the lost returns.  Thus, the offtake agreement needs to be ironclad – even more so than for a commercial lender. 

3.         Gap Financing.  New market tax credit financing should be thought of as the "gap" financing that plugs the balance of finance after all other sources are accounted for.  Thus, to make a strong case to a CDE, the new market tax credit investor should have other financing sources lined up.

While new market tax credit financing is a powerful financing tool, it is not a certainty.  Careful planning and timing can make the difference in securing a tax credit commitment from a CDE.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

Hamang Patel is a partner in Michael Best's Madison office, practicing principally in tax and business law. Mr. Patel has extensive experience in federal, state and local tax issues arising from a broad range of complex transactions involving partnerships and joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, dispositions of subsidiaries and divisions, tax-free reorganizations, spin-offs, new market tax credit financings, REIT acquisitions, renewable energy tax incentives and real estate transactions including tax-deferred 1031 exchanges. His practice further includes general corporate and...

608-283-2278

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.