Advertisement

June 19, 2013

The Trademark Audit: A Necessary Legal Check-up

A few weeks ago, we said goodbye to 2011, welcomed 2012, and made some New Year’s resolutions — whether it be to shed a few extra pounds, to quit smoking, or to complain less and laugh more. While it is great to make New Year’s resolutions for your personal life, it’s also a good time to make new business resolutions. So here is a good one: audit your company’s trademark portfolio on a regular basis.

Why conduct a trademark audit?

A company’s trademarks and service marks are the “face” of its business and, therefore, its most valuable assets. Just like a health check-up, business owners should thoroughly review their trademark portfolio on a yearly or even bi-annual basis because: (1) the review will identify new and existing marks and give a company a clear picture of its assets, and (2) it will help a company manage, protect, and fully exploit the value of those assets. When companies fail to conduct audits on a regular basis, business nightmares may occur. For instance, when a company doesn’t conduct an audit, it runs the risk of missing deadlines and having its registered marks cancelled, resulting in a loss of valuable trademark rights (not to mention the investments made through the registration process). This loss may in turn prevent a company from enforcing its rights against an infringer or exploiting the use of its marks domestically and in foreign countries.

A trademark audit enables a company to reevaluate the direction it wishes to take with respect to the use and maintenance of its marks. For instance, after reviewing its portfolio, a company may decide that it does not need to maintain or register more marks given its current marketing strategy, or it may realize that it is under-protected and needs to register more marks in the US or in foreign jurisdictions or expand the scope of goods or services for its existing registrations. A trademark audit also may help a company identify new opportunities to license its marks to others, which will generate additional revenue for the company. Typically, the first question that a potential licensee will ask about a mark is if it is registered in the jurisdictions of interest. If so, this will put the potential licensee at ease and enable a smoother negotiation process.

What does a trademark audit entail?

Conducting a trademark audit is not a daunting task. It may be time-consuming, though, and should be performed by someone who has a firm understanding of trademarks and service marks. The first step in the process is to thoroughly review a company’s product line or services, web site, and promotional and marketing literature and take an inventory of all new and existing marks — house marks (i.e., a company’s core brand name), word marks, slogans, logos, and non-traditional trademarks such as distinctive product packaging and design. Once the review is complete, a check should be done to determine that the marks are registered with or are the subject of pending applications before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and foreign trademark offices. At this point, companies may discover that they haven’t filed applications to register certain marks in the countries that they are using them in or in geographic markets where they plan to use them in the future or, even worse, haven’t conducted comprehensive searches on the marks to determine if they are available to use or register, or have expanded the use of certain marks for goods and services not covered in their initial application filings or registrations. The audit also may bring to light the fact that a company’s marketing team is phasing out and replacing certain marks or that particular marks have been abandoned for a while and that it is no longer necessary to maintain or renew them in all or some jurisdictions. Thus, a trademark audit ensures that a company will obtain protection for marks it is currently using or will use in the near future, which will enable it to exploit and enforce its marks for all relevant goods and services in the geographic areas of interest.

In addition to determining if marks are registered or the subject of pending trademark or service mark applications, the trademark auditor should take note of whether marks are being used properly and if the proper trademark noticesi.e., TM or SM for pending marks and ® for registered marks, have been affixed to the marks on product packaging/containers, web sites and signage, and in promotional and marketing literature. Using a mark properly and affixing the appropriate legal notice to the mark will prevent a mark from becoming generic and losing its value as a source indicator. Proper trademark use also will help a mark become distinctive and deter others from adopting a confusingly similar mark for competing or related goods and services.

In many countries, trademark rights can lapse and registrations can be cancelled if a mark hasn’t been used for a period of three to five years. Thus, the trademark audit should focus on whether important trademarks are in use and have been renewed with appropriate trademark offices. By reviewing the use and status of trademark registrations, a trademark owner can take necessary steps to prevent a loss of trademark rights — whether it be advertising a mark in foreign publications or implementing a program to use marks on a seasonal or promotional basis.

In today’s global economy, there is widespread pirating and counterfeiting of intellectual property, which can include the importation and exportation of goods either displaying a company’s trademark or a confusingly similar mark. The trademark audit should include making a determination as to whether a company’s federally registered marks have been recorded with the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP). If the audit reveals that this important step was overlooked, consideration should be given to recording trademarks with CBP as soon as possible since the process is relatively simple and inexpensive. Once registered marks have been recorded, customs officials will be able to detain, seize, and forfeit shipments of trademarked goods that violate your company’s federally registered trademark rights. This easy task will have long-term benefits for trademark owners in that it will prevent a company’s reputation from being tarnished and it will keep profits going into the right pockets — those of trademark owners.

Everyone knows that it’s wise to have regular check-ups to live a healthy life. Since it’s the beginning of a New Year, why not make a new resolution to conduct a regular trademark audit, a legal check-up on your company’s trademark portfolio? Conducting a trademark audit will not only ensure that a company protects and maintains its most valuable assets, but will enable a company to explore new business opportunities and exploit its marks to their full potential — resulting in fewer business nightmares and an increase in revenue.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Christine is of counsel in the firm's New York office, practicing in the Intellectual Property Section. She concentrates her practice on trademark prosecution and other aspects of trademark law for clients in both the New York and Boston offices.

Christine manages the trademark portfolios of clients in a variety of fields, including skin care and beauty products, spas, pharmaceuticals, biotechnical products, software, publications, and financial and business products, among others.

(212) 692-6236

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.