May 25, 2012

Two More Extensions: IRS and FinCEN Issue Extensions for Certain FBAR Filers in IRS Notice 2011-54 and FinCEN Notice 2011-2

On June 16, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2011-54, which provides that U.S. persons having signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts in 2009 or earlier calendar years for which the reporting deadline was extended by Notice 2009-62 or Notice 2010-23 will now have until November 1, 2011 to file Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs) with respect to those accounts. The deadline for reporting signature authority over, or a financial interest in, foreign financial accounts for the 2010 calendar year remains June 30, 2011.

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) of the U.S. Treasury Department issued Notice 2011-2 on June 17, providing a filing extension until June 30, 2012 for certain U.S. persons who are employees or officers of investment advisors registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and who have signature or other authority over and no financial interest in foreign financial accounts of persons that are not investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act).

Background

Generally, any U.S. person or entity that at any time during a calendar year has a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, financial accounts located in a foreign country with an aggregate value in excess of $10,000 is required to file. The filing deadline for FBARs for each year is June 30 of the following year. Accordingly, FBARs for 2010 are due June 30, 2011.

FinCEN issued final rules (RIN 1506-AB08) on February 24, 2011 regarding FBAR filing requirements (the Final Regulations). These rules reflected only minor changes to the proposed rules issued February 23, 2010 (the Proposed Regulations).

On February 26, 2010, the IRS issued Notice 2010-23, which provided a delayed filing date for certain FBARs until June 30, 2011 for some persons with only signature authority over foreign financial accounts but no financial interest in such accounts and for persons owning certain commingled funds. The FBARs affected by the delayed filing date in Notice 2010-23 concern accounts for 2009 and prior calendar years.

IRS Notice 2011-54

The IRS became aware that individuals with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, foreign financial accounts are having difficulty compiling the information needed to file complete and accurate FBARs with respect to 2009 or earlier calendar years by the June 30, 2011 deadline, as previously

extended by Notice 2009-62 or Notice 2010-23. Accordingly, the IRS and FinCEN provided the extension for such persons to file their past FBARs until November 1, 2011. All 2010 FBARs are still due on June 30, 2011.

FinCEN Notice 2011-2

On June 17, 2011, FinCEN provided an extension to file FBARs until June 30, 2012 to certain individuals who are employees or officers of investment advisors registered with the SEC and who have signature or other authority over and no financial interest in foreign financial accounts of persons that are not investment companies registered under the 1940 Act. The current exemption set forth in the Final Regulations only covers employees of "Authorized Service Providers" (ASPs) with respect to accounts of mutual funds that are registered under the 1940 Act.

A number of formal and informal comments were made by industry participants that this definition was too narrow and made distinctions that were not necessary to carry out the goals sought to be achieved by the FBAR program. It is hoped that the extra time for a broader range of employees of SEC-registered advisers will give FinCEN more time to craft rules and exemptions for some, or all, of these individuals. FinCEN and the IRS have confirmed that an individual with mere investment authority over an account does not require an FBAR filing where such individual does not have the ability to remove assets from the account. Questions about this rule, however, arise under a number of different factual circumstances. For example, an employee of an investment advisor who, in addition to providing investment advice, has the ability to satisfy an invoice from an account of a client will have an FBAR requirement under informal FinCEN advice; whereas only having investment authority over such account as described above would not give rise to an FBAR filing requirement. The extension is a welcome development to permit more time to explore the various duties of these types of individuals with FinCEN to determine which individuals, if any, would be required to file FBARs as a result of signature authority.

The Ultimate FBAR Due Date Chart

Given the number of extensions that have been provided to potential FBAR filers, we have created the Ultimate FBAR Due Date Chart. The chart is available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/IRS_FinCENGuidanceChart_20june11.pdf. If recent history is a guide, we will be updating this chart on a regular basis.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. For information about why we are required to include this legend, please see http://www.morganlewis.com/circular230.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Richard S. Zarin is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice resident in the New York office. Mr. Zarin provides counseling on tax matters involving international and domestic transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, the formation and operation of operating joint ventures and partnerships and debt restructurings in and out of bankruptcy. His clients include companies in the media, financial services and insurance industries. Mr. Zarin also has an extensive background in representing organizers of and investors in onshore and offshore...

212.309.6879

About the Author

Partner

Barton W.S. Bassett is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. Mr. Bassett's practice focuses on international tax planning for both the outbound operations of U.S. multinationals and the inbound operations of foreign multinationals. This includes advice on structuring mergers and acquisitions, internal restructurings and operations, joint ventures, external and internal financings, and transfer pricing matters, including the transfers and licenses of intellectual property. Mr. Bassett also represents clients in audits and appeals before the Internal Revenue...

650.843.7567

Contributors

Partner

William P. Zimmerman is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. Mr. Zimmerman’s practice focuses on the creation and operation of private and pooled investment vehicles, including mutual funds, hedge funds and other investment-related vehicles. He also has a significant background in advising clients on general corporate and individual tax planning matters, including reorganizations, mergers, acquisitions, spin-offs, recapitalizations and workouts.

215.963.5023

About the Author

Partner

William F. Colgin, Jr. is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Tax Practice. His practice focuses on tax controversy and tax litigation, including representation of clients before the U.S. Tax Court, the Internal Revenue Service, and state taxing authorities. Mr. Colgin primarily represents corporate taxpayers and individual taxpayers in large dollar matters or complicated disputes.

415.442.1347

About the Author

Partner

Gary A. Herrmann is a partner in Morgan Lewis’s Business and Finance Practice, with more than 20 years of experience in a broad spectrum of federal and state tax issues. Mr. Herrmann’s practice focuses on private investment funds, including buyout, venture capital, hedge and real estate funds, and other alternative investment vehicles. He also has substantial experience in the taxation of corporate acquisitions, spin-offs, other restructurings, corporate finance, partnerships, real estate and financial products. He has advised many corporations and...

415.442.1380

About the Author

Partner

Mark E. Matthews is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Litigation and Tax Practices. Mr. Matthews focuses his practice on criminal tax enforcement, broad-based civil tax compliance, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), white collar matters, and anti-money laundering matters. He also advises clients on the IRS voluntary disclosure program, with particular focus on disclosure related to offshore banking accounts.

202.739.5655

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.